Renee Y. Hsia (
Nandita Sarkar is a postdoctoral research analyst at the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1115-1122. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1602.
Inpatient volume has long been believed to be a contributing factor to ambulance diversion, which can lead to delayed treatment and poorer outcomes. We examined the extent to which both daily inpatient and emergency department (ED) volumes at specified hospitals, and diversion levels (that is, the number of hours ambulances were diverted on a given day) at their nearest neighboring hospitals, were associated with diversion levels in the period 2005-12. We found that a 10 percent increase in patient volume was associated with a sevenfold greater increase in diversion hours when the volume increase occurred among inpatients (5 percent) versus ED visitors (0.7 percent). When the next-closest ED experienced mild, moderate, or severe diversion, the study hospital's diversion hours increased by 8 percent, 23 percent, and 44 percent, respectively. These findings suggest that efforts focused on managing inpatient volume and flow might reduce diversion more effectively than interventions focused only on ED dynamics.
长期以来,人们一直认为住院病人数量是导致救护车分流的一个因素,这可能导致治疗延误和预后较差。我们研究了指定医院的每日住院病人和急诊部(ED)数量,以及最近的邻院的分流水平(即给定日期救护车分流的小时数)在 2005-12 年期间与分流水平的关联程度。我们发现,当住院病人(5%)的数量增加 10%,而急诊部访客(0.7%)的数量不变时,分流小时数会增加 7 倍。当下一个最近的急诊部出现轻度、中度或重度分流时,研究医院的分流小时数分别增加了 8%、23%和 44%。这些发现表明,集中精力管理住院病人数量和流量的措施可能比仅关注 ED 动态的干预措施更有效地减少分流。