• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际认知扭曲量表:编制与心理测量学特征

The Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale: development and psychometric characteristics.

作者信息

Hamamci Zeynep, Büyüköztürk Sener

机构信息

University of Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2004 Aug;95(1):291-303. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.1.291-303.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.95.1.291-303
PMID:15460384
Abstract

In this study, an Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale was developed to assess cognitive distortions in individuals' interpersonal relationships. The sample comprised 425 university students. A factor analysis yielded three factors: Interpersonal Rejection, Unrealistic Relationship Expectation and Interpersonal Misperception. To examine construct validity the correlations between the scores on the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale and the Automatic Thoughts Scale (.54), the Irrational Belief Scale (.54), and the Conflict Tendency Scale (.53) were estimated. The first factor, the second factor, and the total scale discriminated married individuals who had low and high conflict intensity and conflict frequency. The reliability of the scale was estimated by performing a test-retest correlation (.74). Cronbach internal consistency coefficient alpha was .67.

摘要

在本研究中,开发了一种人际认知扭曲量表来评估个体人际关系中的认知扭曲。样本包括425名大学生。因子分析产生了三个因子:人际拒绝、不切实际的关系期望和人际误解。为检验结构效度,估计了人际认知扭曲量表得分与自动思维量表(.54)、非理性信念量表(.54)和冲突倾向量表(.53)之间的相关性。第一个因子、第二个因子和总量表区分了冲突强度和冲突频率低与高的已婚个体。通过重测相关性(.74)估计了该量表的信度。克朗巴赫内部一致性系数阿尔法为.67。

相似文献

1
The Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale: development and psychometric characteristics.人际认知扭曲量表:编制与心理测量学特征
Psychol Rep. 2004 Aug;95(1):291-303. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.1.291-303.
2
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Development of a short form of the Japanese version of the Interpersonal Relationship Inventory.日本版人际关系量表简版的编制
Psychol Rep. 2009 Oct;105(2):610-24. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.2.610-624.
4
Development of the Relationship Beliefs Questionnaire.关系信念问卷的编制
Psychol Rep. 1995 Jun;76(3 Pt 2):1248-50. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3c.1248.
5
Further evidence for construct validity of the Interpersonal Relationship Inventory: Japanese version.人际关系量表(日语版)结构效度的进一步证据
Psychol Rep. 2008 Apr;102(2):595-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.102.2.595-596.
6
UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure.加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表(第3版):信度、效度和因子结构。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.
7
The IIS-32: a brief inventory of interpersonal strengths.IIS-32:人际关系优势简要清单。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(6):638-46. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.681818. Epub 2012 May 9.
8
Initial reliability of a Turkish version of the Dyadic Trust Scale.二元信任量表土耳其语版本的初始信度
Psychol Rep. 2008 Dec;103(3):917-20. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.3.917-920.
9
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Emotional Intelligence Scale among college students and psychiatric outpatients.大学生和精神科门诊患者中日语版情绪智力量表的效度和信度。
Psychol Rep. 2001 Dec;89(3):625-32. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.3.625.
10
Symptoms of schizotypy precede cannabis use.分裂型人格障碍症状先于大麻使用出现。
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Mar 30;134(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.01.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Fostering Healthier Interpersonal Dynamics: A Mentalization-Based Antibullying Program for ICU Nurses.培养更健康的人际关系动态:一项针对重症监护室护士的基于心理化的反欺凌计划。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 30;2025:3192349. doi: 10.1155/jonm/3192349. eCollection 2025.
2
Interpersonal cognitive distortions and family role performances in spouses during COVID-19 pandemic process in Turkey.土耳其 COVID-19 大流行期间配偶的人际认知扭曲和家庭角色表现。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Jan;58(1):189-196. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12795. Epub 2021 Apr 19.