Azoury Myriam, Cohen Drorit, Himberg Kimmo, Qvintus-Leino Pia, Saari Terhi, Almog Joseph
Latent Fingerprint Laboratory, Division of Identification and Forensic Science, Israel Police, National H.Q., Jerusalem 91906, Israel.
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Sep;49(5):1015-7.
Two seizures of counterfeit 100 US dollar bills related to the same indicative number were submitted for processing of latent fingerprints. On one group of notes, identifiable fingerprints could be detected by the routine application of amino acid reagents. In the second case, this technique gave no results, even on deliberately deposited prints. Fingerprints could be revealed, however, by cyanoacrylate fuming followed by magnetic powder. Comprehensive paper analysis showed that banknotes from both seizures differed remarkably by chemical composition as well as paper macroscopic properties. The difference in surface free energy (related to surface tension) of the banknotes in the two groups seemed to be the major factor responsible for the great variance in fingerprint detectability.
两张与相同指示编号相关的伪造100美元纸币被提交用于处理潜在指纹。在一组纸币上,通过常规应用氨基酸试剂可以检测到可识别的指纹。在第二个案例中,即使对故意留存的指纹,该技术也未得出结果。然而,通过氰基丙烯酸酯熏蒸然后使用磁粉,可以显现出指纹。全面的纸张分析表明,两次查获的纸币在化学成分以及纸张宏观特性方面存在显著差异。两组纸币表面自由能(与表面张力相关)的差异似乎是导致指纹可检测性差异巨大的主要因素。