Iscan Mümtaz
Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, 06100 Tandogan-Ankara, Turkey.
Toxicology. 2004 Dec 15;205(3):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.051.
In recent years, the recognition of generation of large quantities of toxicants and their by-products due to the industrial and/or cultural activities and transport and their persistence in the environment and biological activities brings out the necessity and importance of their assessment of risk they pose to the ecosystems (e.g. aquatic environment-coastal waters, rivers, lakes and ground water). Indeed, understanding the impacts of contaminants on the environment, including the organisms which live in it, is rather complicated. Nevertheless, the need for protection of the scarce natural resources in the environment and wiser use of them brings the necessity and importance of focusing more attention to the issue. Accordingly the process of ecological risk assessment (ERA) has evolved rapidly since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a framework for ecological risk assessment in 1992. The ecological risk assessment involves three stages in a continuous process: (1) problem formulation (problem identification-hazard identification), (2) the analysis of exposure and effects and (3) risk characterisation. Risk management follows the risk characterisation. Of these stages, problem identification is the most critical one which establishes the direction and scope of the ecological risk assessment. The stage involves identifying the actual environmental value(s) to be protected (assessment endpoints) and selecting ways in which these can be measured and evaluated (measurement endpoints). The accuracy of the risk estimation is largely based on the availability of the key information about the contaminant characteristics, ecosystem at risk and ecological effects and the less uncertainty associated with them. The key information required during this phase of the risk assessment process are as follows: (a) potential/actual contaminant of concern, (b) source of contaminant; current and historic use, (c) mode of action of the contaminant, (d) contaminant characteristics (e.g. physical/chemical properties and environmental behaviour, persistence in the ecosystem, transformation products and bioaccumulation), (e) ecosystem potentially at risk and (f) areas of uncertainty. Finally based on these information a conceptual model has to be developed to define the possible exposure and assessment scenarios. Herein, the aforementioned key issues concerning the problem-hazard identification stage of ecological risk assessment for contaminants have been briefly reviewed.
近年来,人们认识到由于工业和/或文化活动、运输产生了大量有毒物质及其副产品,它们在环境中持续存在并具有生物活性,这凸显了评估它们对生态系统(如水生环境——沿海水域、河流、湖泊和地下水)所构成风险的必要性和重要性。的确,了解污染物对环境的影响,包括对生活在其中的生物的影响,是相当复杂的。然而,保护环境中稀缺的自然资源并更明智地利用它们的需求,使得更关注这一问题变得必要且重要。因此,自美国环境保护局(EPA)于1992年发布生态风险评估框架以来,生态风险评估(ERA)过程迅速发展。生态风险评估在一个连续的过程中涉及三个阶段:(1)问题 formulation(问题识别——危害识别),(2)暴露和影响分析,以及(3)风险表征。风险管理紧随风险表征之后。在这些阶段中,问题识别是最关键的阶段,它确定了生态风险评估的方向和范围。该阶段涉及识别要保护的实际环境价值(评估终点),并选择测量和评估这些价值的方法(测量终点)。风险估计的准确性很大程度上基于有关污染物特性、受威胁生态系统和生态影响的关键信息的可用性,以及与之相关的较少不确定性。风险评估过程这一阶段所需的关键信息如下:(a)潜在/实际关注的污染物,(b)污染物来源;当前和历史用途,(c)污染物的作用方式,(d)污染物特性(如物理/化学性质和环境行为、在生态系统中的持久性、转化产物和生物累积),(e)可能受威胁的生态系统,以及(f)不确定性领域。最后,必须基于这些信息开发一个概念模型,以定义可能的暴露和评估情景。在此,对上述有关污染物生态风险评估问题——危害识别阶段的关键问题进行了简要回顾。