Olsen Ø E, Ndeki S, Norheim O F
Center for International Health, N-5021, University of Bergen, Norway.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Oct;87(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.07.002.
Our objective was to determine the availability and quality of obstetric care to improve resource allocation in northern Tanzania. We surveyed all facilities providing delivery services (n=129) in six districts in northern Tanzania using the UN Guidelines for monitoring emergency obstetric care (EmOC). The three last questions in this audit outline are examined: Are the right women (those with obstetric complications) using emergency obstetric care facilities (Met Need)? Are sufficient quantities of critical services being provided (cesarean section rate (CSR))? Is the quality of the services adequate (case fatality rate (CFR))? Complications are calculated using Plan 3 of the UN Guidelines to assess the value of routine data for EmOC indicator monitoring. Nearly 60% of the expected complicated deliveries in the study population were conducted at EmOC qualified health facilities. 81.2% of the expected complicated deliveries are conducted in any facility (including facilities not qualifying as EmOC facilities). There is an inadequate level of critical services provided (CSR 4.6). Voluntary agencies provide most of these services in rural settings. All indicators show large variations with the setting (urban/rural location, level and ownership of facilities). Finally, there is large variation in the CFR with only one facility meeting the minimum accepted level. Utilization and quality of critical obstetric services at lower levels and in rural districts must be improved. The potential for improving the resource allocation within lower levels of the health care system is discussed. Given the small number of qualified facilities yet relatively high Met Need, we argue that it is neither the mothers' ignorance nor their lack of ability to get to a facility that is the main barrier to receiving quality care when needed, but rather the lack of quality care at the facility. Little can be concluded using the CFR to describe the quality of services provided.
我们的目标是确定坦桑尼亚北部产科护理的可及性和质量,以改善资源分配。我们使用联合国监测急诊产科护理(EmOC)的指南,对坦桑尼亚北部六个地区提供分娩服务的所有机构(n = 129)进行了调查。本次审计大纲的最后三个问题如下:患有产科并发症的合适女性(即正确的女性)是否在使用急诊产科护理机构(满足需求)?是否提供了足够数量的关键服务(剖宫产率(CSR))?服务质量是否足够(病死率(CFR))?使用联合国指南的方案3计算并发症,以评估用于EmOC指标监测的常规数据的价值。研究人群中近60%的预期复杂分娩在符合EmOC标准的医疗机构进行。81.2%的预期复杂分娩在任何机构进行(包括不符合EmOC标准的机构)。关键服务的提供水平不足(CSR为4.6)。志愿机构在农村地区提供了大部分此类服务。所有指标在不同环境(城市/农村地点、机构级别和所有权)中都存在很大差异。最后,CFR差异很大,只有一家机构达到了最低可接受水平。必须提高较低级别和农村地区关键产科服务的利用率和质量。讨论了在医疗保健系统较低级别改善资源分配的潜力。鉴于合格机构数量较少,但满足需求的比例相对较高,我们认为,在需要时获得优质护理的主要障碍既不是母亲的无知,也不是她们无法前往医疗机构,而是医疗机构缺乏优质护理。使用CFR来描述所提供服务的质量几乎无法得出结论。