Galetta Fabio, Franzoni Ferdinando, Femia Francesca Romana, Prattichizzo Fernando, Bartolomucci Francesco, Santoro Gino, Carpi Angelo
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2004 Oct;58(8):443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2004.08.007.
The aim of the present study was to assess the cardiovascular autonomic function and responses to tilt test in young and elderly patients with syncope of unknown origin. We evaluated two groups of patients with previous unexplained syncope: 192 older subjects (112 males, 80 females, mean age 67.2 +/- 6.8 years) and 188 young subjects (102 males, 86 females, mean age 25 +/- 9 years). All patients underwent ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, to evaluate time domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV), and head-up tilt test in the morning after an overnight fast. The responses of positive tilt test were classified using the VAsovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) criteria: mixed (VASIS-1), cardioinhibition (VASIS-2A), severe cardioinhibition/asystole (VASIS-2B), pure vasodepression (VASIS-3). All the time-domain HRV indexes were lower in the older than in young subjects. The rate of positive responses was not different in the two groups. In elderly group the positive head-up tilt test responses showed: a pure vasodepressive response (VASIS 3) in 126 patients (65%), a mixed (VASIS-1) response in 25 patients (13%), a cardioinhibitory (VASIS-2A) response in 13 patients (7%). Only 28 (14.6%) of elderly group patients had negative head-up tilt test response. In contrast, in young group the positive head-up tilt test responses showed: 114 patients (61.2%) a mixed (VASIS-1) vasovagal response, 40 patients (22.3%) a cardioinhibitory (VASIS-2A) response, four (2.1%) patients a severe cardioinhibitory (VASIS-2B) and four (2.1%) patients a pure vasodepression (VASIS-3) response, respectively. The tilt test was negative in response in 26 young patients (12.2%). Our results confirm that the head-up tilt test may be useful in assessing unexplained syncope, since it is seen to be positive in 85% of elderly patients and 86% in young patients. In our subjects, vasodepressive response was the most frequent cause of syncope in older subjects, while vasovagal response is the commonest cause of syncope of young patients. This different behaviour in the elderly may be is explained with physiological aging, which is associated with a reduction of sympathetic-parasympathetic control on the cardiac rhythm, demonstrated by reduction in all the time domain HRV indices.
本研究的目的是评估不明原因晕厥的年轻和老年患者的心血管自主神经功能及对倾斜试验的反应。我们评估了两组既往有不明原因晕厥的患者:192名老年受试者(112名男性,80名女性,平均年龄67.2±6.8岁)和188名年轻受试者(102名男性,86名女性,平均年龄25±9岁)。所有患者均接受动态心电图(ECG)监测,以评估心率变异性(HRV)的时域指标,并在禁食过夜后的早晨进行头高位倾斜试验。阳性倾斜试验的反应根据血管迷走性晕厥国际研究(VASIS)标准进行分类:混合型(VASIS-1)、心脏抑制型(VASIS-2A)、严重心脏抑制/心搏停止型(VASIS-2B)、单纯血管减压型(VASIS-3)。所有时域HRV指标在老年受试者中均低于年轻受试者。两组的阳性反应率无差异。在老年组中,阳性头高位倾斜试验反应表现为:126例患者(65%)为单纯血管减压反应(VASIS 3),25例患者(13%)为混合型(VASIS-1)反应,13例患者(7%)为心脏抑制型(VASIS-2A)反应。老年组仅28例(14.6%)患者头高位倾斜试验反应为阴性。相比之下,在年轻组中,阳性头高位倾斜试验反应表现为:114例患者(61.2%)为混合型(VASIS-1)血管迷走反应,40例患者(22.3%)为心脏抑制型(VASIS-2A)反应,4例(2.1%)患者为严重心脏抑制型(VASIS-2B)反应,4例(2.1%)患者为单纯血管减压型(VASIS-3)反应。26例年轻患者(12.2%)倾斜试验反应为阴性。我们的结果证实,头高位倾斜试验可能有助于评估不明原因的晕厥,因为在老年患者中85%可见阳性反应,在年轻患者中86%可见阳性反应。在我们的研究对象中,血管减压反应是老年受试者晕厥最常见的原因,而血管迷走反应是年轻患者晕厥最常见的原因。老年人这种不同的表现可能可用生理衰老来解释,生理衰老与对心律的交感-副交感神经控制减弱有关,这表现为所有时域HRV指标降低。