Nicolini A, Mancini Pa, Ferrari P, Anselmi L, Tartarelli G, Bonazzi V, Carpi A, Giardino R
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2004 Oct;58(8):447-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2004.08.006.
The chemotherapeutic approach to hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer (MHRPC) for a long time included only estramustine. Then, attempts have been made with other various agents as cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, etoposide, taxanes and carboplatinum. Although the new drugs and combinations have increased the response rate of MHRPC, they have had no impact on the natural history of MHRPC, which is about 1 year as median time of survival. After an occasional observation of prolonged response in a patient with MHRPC treated with a very well tolerated oral low-dose of cyclophosphamide, from February 1996 to October 2002, seven more patients with MHRPC and progressive disease were consecutively recruited. Response to treatment was evaluated by conventional radiological procedures and/or serial serum PSA measurements. The decline of PSA value was considered to assess the response consistent with the response guidelines from the prostate specific antigen-working group. All eight studied patients continuously received oral low dose cyclophosphamide until progression or the occurrence of significant toxicity. So far three patients (37.5%) progressed (PD), two (25%) showed PR and the three remaining SD. Response rate was 25%, and clinical benefit occurred in 62.5% of the studied patients. In the five patients with clinical benefit on cyclophosphamide median duration of clinical benefit, PR and SD were 9, 24+ and 8 months, respectively. In these five patients median overall survival times from cyclophosphamide and from the first regimen of chemotherapy were 17 and 33+ months respectively, while in the three patients with PD they were 4 and 13 months. The same interval times in patients with > or =50% decline of serum PSA were 29 and 50.5 months, while in those with <50% decline of the same marker, they were 13 and 32 months, respectively. Grade 2 or 3 neutropenia were observed in all the studied patients. In four (50%) of them pulmonary and urinary infections that were easily cured by the common antibiotics occurred. These data suggest that the metronomic use of cyclophosphamide, given alone, has similar or higher activity with lower toxicity than when administered with other active drugs. So it can be an useful option before or after the use of other single or combined potentially active chemotherapeutic agents.
长期以来,激素难治性转移性前列腺癌(MHRPC)的化疗方法仅包括雌莫司汀。随后,人们尝试使用其他各种药物,如环磷酰胺、长春碱、依托泊苷、紫杉烷和卡铂。尽管新药及其联合应用提高了MHRPC的缓解率,但对MHRPC的自然病程并无影响,其生存中位数时间约为1年。在偶然观察到一名接受口服低剂量环磷酰胺且耐受性良好的MHRPC患者出现长期缓解后,从1996年2月至2002年10月,又连续招募了7例患有MHRPC且病情进展的患者。通过传统放射学检查和/或连续血清PSA测量来评估治疗反应。PSA值下降被视为评估符合前列腺特异性抗原工作组反应指南的反应。所有8例研究患者持续接受口服低剂量环磷酰胺治疗,直至病情进展或出现明显毒性。到目前为止,3例患者(37.5%)病情进展(PD),2例(25%)显示部分缓解(PR),其余3例病情稳定(SD)。缓解率为25%,62.5%的研究患者出现临床获益。在5例对环磷酰胺有临床获益的患者中,临床获益、PR和SD的中位持续时间分别为9、24 +和8个月。在这5例患者中,从使用环磷酰胺和首次化疗方案开始计算的中位总生存时间分别为17和33 +个月,而在3例病情进展的患者中,分别为4和13个月。血清PSA下降≥50%的患者的相同间隔时间分别为29和50.5个月,而血清PSA下降<50%的患者的相同间隔时间分别为13和32个月。所有研究患者均观察到2级或3级中性粒细胞减少。其中4例(50%)发生肺部和泌尿系统感染,使用普通抗生素很容易治愈。这些数据表明,单独使用环磷酰胺进行节拍化疗与与其他活性药物联合使用相比,具有相似或更高的活性且毒性更低。因此,它可以作为在使用其他单一或联合潜在活性化疗药物之前或之后的一个有用选择。