Auvinen Jaana, Suominen Tarja, Leino-Kilpi Helena, Helkama Klaus
Yliopistonkatu 7 C 30, 20100 Turku, Finland.
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Oct;24(7):538-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.005.
This study describes moral judgment among first- and last-year nursing students in Finland and examines the effects of ethics teaching on the development of moral judgment. The data for this quantitative cross-sectional study were collected using the Defining Issues Test (DIT), which is based on Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning stages. The questionnaires were sent to four polytechnics, which offer nursing education in southern Finland. A total of 52 first-year students and 54 last-year students participated. The results showed that students who had had to deal with ethical dilemmas in their practical training had higher moral judgment than students who did not. Last-year students had higher moral judgment than first-year students. Last-year students resorted to principle-based thinking more often than first-year students in resolving DIT dilemmas. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant. The results indicate that nursing education may has an effect upon students' moral judgment.
本研究描述了芬兰护理专业一年级和最后一年学生的道德判断情况,并考察了伦理教学对道德判断发展的影响。这项定量横断面研究的数据是使用基于科尔伯格道德推理阶段理论的界定问题测试(DIT)收集的。问卷被发送到芬兰南部提供护理教育的四所理工学院。共有52名一年级学生和54名最后一年学生参与。结果表明,在实践训练中必须处理伦理困境的学生比未处理过的学生有更高的道德判断。最后一年学生比一年级学生有更高的道德判断。在解决DIT困境时,最后一年学生比一年级学生更常采用基于原则的思维方式。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义。结果表明,护理教育可能对学生的道德判断有影响。