Kim Yong-Soon, Park Jin-Hee, Han Sung-Suk
Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
Nurs Ethics. 2007 May;14(3):309-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007075865.
This longitudinal study examined how nursing students' moral judgment changes after they become qualified nurses working in a hospital environment. The sample used was a group of 80 nursing students attending a university in Suwon, Korea, between 2001 and 2003. By using a Korean version of the Judgment About Nursing Decisions questionnaire, an instrument used in nursing care research, moral judgment scores based on Ketefian's six nursing dilemmas were determined. The results were as follows: (1) the qualified nurses had significantly higher idealistic moral judgment scores than the nursing students; (2) the qualified nurses showed significantly higher realistic moral judgment scores than the nursing students; and (3) when comparing idealistic and realistic moral judgment scores, both the qualified nurses and the nursing students had higher scores for idealistic moral judgment. Further study is recommended to examine changes in moral judgment.
这项纵向研究考察了护理专业学生成为在医院环境中工作的合格护士后其道德判断是如何变化的。所采用的样本是2001年至2003年间在韩国水原市一所大学就读的80名护理专业学生。通过使用护理决策判断问卷的韩语版本(一种用于护理研究的工具),确定了基于凯特菲安提出的六个护理困境的道德判断得分。结果如下:(1)合格护士的理想主义道德判断得分显著高于护理专业学生;(2)合格护士的现实主义道德判断得分显著高于护理专业学生;(3)在比较理想主义和现实主义道德判断得分时,合格护士和护理专业学生的理想主义道德判断得分都更高。建议进行进一步研究以考察道德判断的变化。