Harley Brian J, Scharfenberger Angela, Beaupre Lauren A, Jomha Nadr, Weber Don W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13206, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Sep;29(5):815-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.05.006.
Many outcome studies of various surgical techniques for unstable fractures of the distal radius have been published but applicability of the results remains limited because the majority of these trials were not done in a prospective and/or randomized manner. In this study we evaluated 2 common surgical techniques used in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in a randomized prospective fashion with a 1-year radiographic and clinical follow-up period. Our hypothesis was that external fixation with augmentation would provide superior results compared with percutaneous pinning and casting.
Fifty patients younger than 65 years of age with unstable fractures of the distal radius were randomized into 1 of 2 surgical treatment groups: percutaneous pins with casting or augmented external fixation. All surgery was performed by 1 of 3 surgeons within 10 days of injury. Over 80% of the fractures were classified as AO-ASIF C2 or C3 and there was a similar distribution of fracture types in each group.
The use of augmented external fixation did not improve the mean radiographic parameters of radial length, radial angulation, or volar tilt. Restoration of volar tilt of highly comminuted fractures was difficult to achieve regardless of the technique. Improved articular surface reduction was realized with the use of an external fixator but overall only 3 patients were noted to have steps or gaps greater than 2 mm. No significant differences in mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, total range of motion, grip strength, or health-related quality of life were observed between the groups. All 3 patients diagnosed with sympathetic dystrophy had had external fixation.
Although augmented external fixation represents a popular first line treatment for unstable fractures of the distal radius this study suggests that for fractures with minimal articular displacement similar clinical results can be obtained with percutaneous pinning and casting.
关于桡骨远端不稳定骨折的各种手术技术已有许多疗效研究发表,但这些研究结果的适用性仍然有限,因为大多数此类试验并非以前瞻性和/或随机方式进行。在本研究中,我们以前瞻性随机方式对两种用于治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的常用手术技术进行了评估,并进行了为期1年的影像学和临床随访。我们的假设是,与经皮穿针及石膏固定相比,外固定架辅助固定能提供更好的治疗效果。
50例65岁以下桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者被随机分为两个手术治疗组之一:经皮穿针及石膏固定组或外固定架辅助固定组。所有手术均由3名外科医生中的1名在受伤后10天内完成。超过80%的骨折被分类为AO-ASIF C2或C3型,且每组骨折类型分布相似。
外固定架辅助固定并未改善桡骨长度、桡骨角度或掌倾角的平均影像学参数。无论采用何种技术,高度粉碎性骨折的掌倾角恢复都很难实现。使用外固定架实现了关节面复位的改善,但总体上仅3例患者被发现台阶或间隙大于2mm。两组之间在手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分均值、总活动范围、握力或健康相关生活质量方面未观察到显著差异。所有3例被诊断为交感神经营养不良的患者均接受了外固定架固定。
尽管外固定架辅助固定是桡骨远端不稳定骨折常用的一线治疗方法,但本研究表明,对于关节移位极小的骨折,经皮穿针及石膏固定可获得相似的临床效果。