Claydon V E, Norcliffe L J, Moore J P, Rivera M, Leon-Velarde F, Appenzeller O, Hainsworth R
Institute for Cardiovascular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Exp Physiol. 2005 Jan;90(1):103-10. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2004.028399. Epub 2004 Oct 4.
High altitude (HA) dwellers have an exceptionally high tolerance to orthostatic stress, and this may partly be related to their high packed cell and blood volumes. However, it is not known whether their orthostatic tolerance would be changed after relief of the altitude-related hypoxia. Furthermore, orthostatic tolerance is known also to be influenced by the efficiency of the control of peripheral vascular resistance and by the effectiveness of cerebral autoregulation and these have not been reported in HA dwellers. In this study we examined plasma volume, orthostatic tolerance and peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular responses to orthostatic stress in HA dwellers, including some with chronic mountain sickness (CMS) in whom packed cell and blood volumes are particularly large. Eleven HA control subjects and 11 CMS patients underwent orthostatic stress testing, comprising head-up tilting with lower body suction, at their resident altitude (4338 m) and at sea level. Blood pressure (Portapres), heart rate (ECG), brachial and middle cerebral artery blood velocities (Doppler) were recorded during the test. Plasma volumes were found to be similar in both groups and at both locations. Packed cell and blood volumes were higher in CMS patients than controls. All subjects had very good orthostatic tolerances at both locations, compared to previously published data in lowland dwellers. In CMS patients responses of forearm vascular resistance to the orthostatic stress, at sea level, were smaller than controls (P < 0.05). Cerebral blood velocity was less in CMS than in controls (P < 0.01) and, at sea level, it decreased more than the controls in response to head-up tilting (P < 0.02). Cerebral autoregulation, assessed from the relationship between cerebral pressure and velocity, was also impaired in CMS patients compared to HA controls, when examined at sea level (P < 0.02). These results have shown that the good orthostatic tolerance seen in high altitude dwellers at altitude is also seen at sea level. There was no difference in orthostatic tolerance between CMS patients, with their exceptionally large blood volumes, and the HA controls. This may be because peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular responses (at least at sea level) are impaired in the CMS patients relative to HA controls. Thus, the advantage of the large blood volume may be offset by the smaller vascular responses.
高海拔地区居民对直立位应激具有极高的耐受性,这可能部分与他们较高的红细胞压积和血容量有关。然而,尚不清楚在缓解与海拔相关的缺氧后,他们的直立位耐受性是否会发生变化。此外,已知直立位耐受性还受外周血管阻力控制效率以及脑自动调节有效性的影响,而关于高海拔地区居民的这些情况尚未见报道。在本研究中,我们检测了高海拔地区居民,包括一些患有慢性高山病(CMS)、红细胞压积和血容量特别大的患者的血浆容量、直立位耐受性以及外周血管和脑血管对直立位应激的反应。11名高海拔地区对照受试者和11名CMS患者在其居住海拔(4338米)和海平面进行了直立位应激测试,包括上身倾斜并对下半身进行负压吸引。测试期间记录血压(Portapres)、心率(心电图)、肱动脉和大脑中动脉血流速度(多普勒)。发现两组在两个地点的血浆容量相似。CMS患者的红细胞压积和血容量高于对照组。与先前发表的低海拔地区居民数据相比,所有受试者在两个地点都具有非常好的直立位耐受性。在海平面时,CMS患者前臂血管阻力对直立位应激的反应小于对照组(P<0.05)。CMS患者的脑血流速度低于对照组(P<0.01),并且在海平面时,其对上身倾斜的反应比对照组下降得更多(P<0.02)。在海平面检查时,与高海拔地区对照相比,根据脑压与血流速度之间的关系评估的脑自动调节在CMS患者中也受损(P<0.02)。这些结果表明,高海拔地区居民在海拔高度时表现出的良好直立位耐受性在海平面时也可见。血容量特别大的CMS患者与高海拔地区对照之间的直立位耐受性没有差异。这可能是因为与高海拔地区对照相比,CMS患者的外周血管和脑血管反应(至少在海平面时)受损。因此,血容量大的优势可能被较小的血管反应所抵消。