Huang Shirley Y, Greenes David S
Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass., USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Oct;158(10):972-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.10.972.
To determine the prevalence of recent antipyretic use among febrile infants at a pediatric emergency department (ED) and to test the hypothesis that recent antipyretic use is associated with lower measured temperatures in the ED.
We prospectively enrolled infants younger than 366 days at a pediatric ED. Eligible subjects had a history of fever prior to arrival at the ED or had a measured temperature of 38 degrees C or higher at the ED. Research assistants collected detailed information about recent use of antipyretic drugs. Peak measured temperature prior to arrival at the ED (temperature maximum [Tmax]), measured temperature at the ED, defervescence from Tmax to measured ED temperature, and rates of diagnostic testing were compared between subjects who had or had not been treated with antipyretic medication within the past 6 hours.
We enrolled 474 infants. Infants treated with an antipyretic medication (n = 187) had a significantly higher Tmax and a significantly higher measured ED temperature than untreated subjects (n = 287) (P<.001). Treated and untreated subjects did not differ in the amount of defervescence from Tmax to measured ED temperature (P = .41) unless treated subjects included only those who reportedly received therapeutic doses of antipyretic medication within 1 to 5 hours prior to arrival at the ED (P = .02).
Although many febrile infants seen in the pediatric ED have recently received antipyretics, only a few have received a therapeutic dose between 1 and 5 hours prior to arrival. Among febrile infants seen in the ED, recent antipyretic use is associated both with a higher reported Tmax and with higher measured temperatures at the ED. Patients treated with a therapeutic antipyretic dose 1 to 5 hours prior to arrival experience more defervescence from their Tmax than untreated subjects.
确定儿科急诊科发热婴儿近期使用退烧药的患病率,并检验近期使用退烧药与急诊科测量体温较低相关的假设。
我们前瞻性纳入了一家儿科急诊科366日龄以下的婴儿。符合条件的受试者在到达急诊科之前有发热病史,或在急诊科测量体温达到38摄氏度或更高。研究助理收集了有关近期使用退烧药的详细信息。比较了在过去6小时内接受或未接受退烧药治疗的受试者到达急诊科之前的最高测量体温(体温最大值[Tmax])、在急诊科的测量体温、从Tmax到急诊科测量体温的退热情况以及诊断检测率。
我们纳入了474名婴儿。接受退烧药治疗的婴儿(n = 187)比未治疗的受试者(n = 287)有显著更高的Tmax和显著更高的急诊科测量体温(P <.001)。除非治疗组仅包括那些据报道在到达急诊科前1至5小时内接受治疗剂量退烧药的受试者,否则治疗组和未治疗组从Tmax到急诊科测量体温的退热量没有差异(P =.41)(P =.02)。
尽管在儿科急诊科就诊的许多发热婴儿近期都接受了退烧药治疗,但只有少数在到达前1至5小时内接受了治疗剂量。在急诊科就诊的发热婴儿中,近期使用退烧药与报告的Tmax较高以及急诊科测量体温较高均相关。在到达前1至5小时接受治疗性退烧药剂量治疗的患者比未治疗的受试者从Tmax的退热更多。