Towler M R, Kenny S, Boyd D, Pembroke T, Buggy M, Hill R G
Materials and Surface Science Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14(4):565-72.
Zinc polyalkenoate cements (ZPCs) and glass polyalkenoate cements (GPCs) are used routinely in dentistry, but have potential for orthopaedic applications as they set at body temperature without shrinkage or significant heat evolution. However, the materials have drawbacks; ZPCs are biocompatible in implant studies, but a fibrous collagen capsular layer forms adjacent to the cement. GPCs are bioactive in the bone environment as a result of the release of calcium, phosphate and fluoride ions, as well as the formation of a silicious gel phase, but research has shown that aluminum ions released result in defective bone mineralisation and as a consequence the ability of these cements to chemically bond to bone is lost. Two approaches have been developed to overcome these problems. The ZPC route considers a ZnO : hydroxyapatite (HA) : poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) mixture, the HA incorporated to improve bioactivity. The GPC route employs a calcium zinc silicate glass; the zinc taking the role that aluminum plays in conventional GPCs. This study has shown that cements can be formulated by an acid base reaction between PAA and both calcium zinc silicate glasses (GPCs) and a mixture of hydroxyapatite and zinc oxide (ZPCs). The moduli of these cements are comparable to both bone and conventional acrylic cements, highlighting their potential for biomedical applications. Unfortunately, both materials have previously been shown to be toxic by cell culture methods, as a result of high zinc ion release, and so it is necessary to study ion release profiles of the cements in order to determine the magnitude of this release. Considering the ZPCs, the modulus of the cement has an inversely proportional relationship to the zinc ion release. From the data presented it is clear that increases in polymer concentration results in lower amounts of zinc ions being released, whilst molar mass of the PAA has no influence. Therefore it would appear that polymer concentration has a significant influence over ion release. Generally, the amount of Zn(2+) released decreases with increasing HA content and/or decreasing ZnO content. Considering the GPCs, the materials are all seen to release large amounts of the active ion, when compared to the commercial versions. The extent of this release increases with temperature and agitation. The release could be minimised by an increased P : L mixing ratio, and an increased PAA concentration, which would produce a more cross-linked cement matrix. Minimising the release of the active ion should improve the in vitro bioactivity of both materials. However, for a full understanding of the clinical benefits of such materials, an in vivo study would be required.
聚链烯酸锌水门汀(ZPCs)和聚链烯酸玻璃水门汀(GPCs)在牙科中常规使用,但由于它们在体温下凝固且无收缩或显著的热释放,因此在骨科应用方面具有潜力。然而,这些材料存在缺点;在植入研究中ZPCs具有生物相容性,但在水门汀附近会形成一层纤维状胶原包膜层。由于钙、磷和氟离子的释放以及硅质凝胶相的形成,GPCs在骨环境中具有生物活性,但研究表明,释放的铝离子会导致骨矿化缺陷,结果这些水门汀与骨化学结合的能力丧失。已开发出两种方法来克服这些问题。ZPC途径考虑使用氧化锌:羟基磷灰石(HA):聚丙烯酸(PAA)的混合物,加入HA以提高生物活性。GPC途径使用硅酸钙锌玻璃;锌起到了铝在传统GPCs中所起的作用。本研究表明,可以通过PAA与硅酸钙锌玻璃(GPCs)以及羟基磷灰石和氧化锌的混合物(ZPCs)之间的酸碱反应来配制水门汀。这些水门汀的模量与骨和传统丙烯酸水门汀相当,突出了它们在生物医学应用方面的潜力。不幸的是,此前通过细胞培养方法已表明这两种材料都具有毒性,原因是锌离子释放量高,因此有必要研究水门汀的离子释放曲线,以确定这种释放的程度。对于ZPCs而言,水门汀的模量与锌离子释放呈反比关系。从所呈现的数据可以明显看出,聚合物浓度增加会导致释放的锌离子量减少,而PAA的摩尔质量没有影响。因此,似乎聚合物浓度对离子释放有显著影响。一般来说,随着HA含量增加和/或ZnO含量降低,释放的Zn(2+)量会减少。对于GPCs而言,与市售产品相比,所有这些材料都被发现会释放大量的活性离子。这种释放的程度随温度和搅拌而增加。通过增加P : L混合比和增加PAA浓度可以使释放最小化,这会产生更交联的水门汀基质。使活性离子的释放最小化应该会提高这两种材料的体外生物活性。然而,为了全面了解此类材料的临床益处,还需要进行体内研究。