Suppr超能文献

毛利人在健康与医学研究中的响应性:明确研究者与机构的角色(第二部分)

Maori responsiveness in health and medical research: clarifying the roles of the researcher and the institution (part 2).

作者信息

Sporle Andrew, Koea Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2004 Aug 6;117(1199):U998.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The combination of the Health Research Council's Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Maori and the 1998 revision of the National application form for ethical approval generated an expectation that all research development required consultation with Maori.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This paper clarifies issues of consultation for health researchers in two ways. Firstly, the historical development of the focus on the Maori research responsiveness is outlined. Secondly, we argue that research institutions, rather than researchers, need to take a lead role in consulting on research issues with Maori organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Consultation with Maori at the institutional level could help clarify and address key ethical issues in research--while reducing the workload for researchers, Maori organisations, and host institutions alike.

摘要

引言

健康研究委员会针对涉及毛利人的健康研究为研究人员制定的指南,以及1998年修订的国家伦理审批申请表,使得人们期望所有研究项目的开展都需要与毛利人进行协商。

方法与结果

本文通过两种方式阐明了健康研究人员的协商问题。首先,概述了对毛利人研究响应性关注的历史发展。其次,我们认为研究机构而非研究人员需要在与毛利人组织就研究问题进行协商中发挥主导作用。

结论

在机构层面与毛利人进行协商有助于澄清和解决研究中的关键伦理问题,同时减轻研究人员、毛利人组织和主办机构的工作量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验