Roche Richard A P, Garavan Hugh, Foxe John J, O'Mara Shane M
Department of Psychology & Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, University of Dublin, Trinity College, 2 Dublin, Ireland.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(1):60-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z.
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 normal participants while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Previous ERP studies have implicated the N2 and P3 waveforms as the main indices of processing in this task, and functional brain imaging has shown parietal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices to be involved in response inhibition. 32-channel ERP analysis revealed amplitude differences in the N2/P3 components when stimuli that required a button-press (Go stimuli) were compared with stimuli for which the response had to be withheld (No-Go stimuli), and in N2 and P3 latencies when successful withholds to No-Go stimuli were compared with unsuccessful attempts to inhibit. Further differences in the N2/P3 complex emerged when participants were grouped in terms of a measure of absentmindedness (the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ); larger and earlier components were found for high CFQ respondents. We conclude that the latencies of the N2 and P3 may be the critical indicators of active inhibitory processes for this task, suggesting that a pattern of sequential activation rather than altered activity level in key structures may mediate success on the task. In addition, highly absentminded participants exhibited larger components for errors than did less absentminded participants when performing at the same level, which implies that the absentminded may require greater activity in the neural substrates of response inhibition in order to accomplish this task at a comparable level of performance to less absentminded participants.
在20名正常参与者完成“Go/NoGo”反应抑制任务时,记录了与事件相关的脑电位(ERP)。先前的ERP研究表明,N2和P3波形是该任务处理的主要指标,功能性脑成像显示顶叶、前额叶和前扣带回皮质参与反应抑制。32通道ERP分析显示,将需要按键的刺激(Go刺激)与必须抑制反应的刺激(No-Go刺激)进行比较时,N2/P3成分存在幅度差异;将成功抑制No-Go刺激与抑制失败的尝试进行比较时,N2和P3潜伏期存在差异。当根据心不在焉程度的一项测量指标(认知失误问卷,CFQ)对参与者进行分组时,N2/P3复合体出现了进一步差异;高CFQ得分的参与者表现出更大、更早出现的成分。我们得出结论,N2和P3的潜伏期可能是该任务中主动抑制过程的关键指标,这表明关键结构中顺序激活模式而非活动水平的改变可能介导任务的成功。此外,在表现水平相同的情况下,高度心不在焉的参与者在犯错时表现出比心不在焉程度较低的参与者更大的成分,这意味着心不在焉的人可能需要在反应抑制的神经基质中进行更大的活动,以便在与心不在焉程度较低的参与者相当的表现水平上完成这项任务。