Moriyama Toshiki, Oka Kazumasa, Ueda Hirotsugu, Imai Enyu
Second Department of Medical Science, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University, 1-17 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004 Sep;8(3):230-6. doi: 10.1007/s10157-004-0303-1.
The renoprotection achieved by angiotensin II blockade in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy is well established in both the clinical and the experimental settings. In contrast, the therapeutic efficacy of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy still remains controversial.
In the present study, we compared the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, and a dihydropyridine CCB, nilvadipine, on nephropathy in the db/db mouse, a rodent model of type 2 diabetes. Male db/db mice were divided into the following three groups at the age of 11 weeks, when treatment was started: vehicle, enalapril (10 mg/kg per day), and nilvadipine (10 mg/kg per day). Blood pressure, urine, and blood chemistry were monitored at the age of 17 and 27 weeks, and kidney samples were obtained at 29 weeks. Morphological changes were analyzed on periodic acid-Schiff-stained sections. Lipid peroxidation in kidney homogenates was measured.
Blood pressure remained normal and was similar in the three groups until 27 weeks. Blood glucose exceeded 300 mg/dl throughout the study in all groups. Reduction of microalbuminuria at 27 weeks, compared to the vehicle group, was 37% and 52% in the enalapril- and nilvadipine-treated groups, respectively. Increased lipid peroxidation was suppressed by 15% and 83% in the enalapril- and nilvadipine-treated groups, respectively. Glomerular hypertrophy, assessed by cross-sectional glomerular area, was significantly suppressed in the nilvadipine group, but not in the enalapril group, compared to the vehicle group.
Nilvadipine shows a stronger renoprotective effect than enalapril in the db/db mouse, independent of the blood-pressure-lowering effect. An antioxidative effect, indicated by the reduction in lipid peroxidation, may partly contribute to the renoprotection conferred by nilvadipine.
在临床和实验环境中,血管紧张素II阻断在治疗糖尿病肾病中实现的肾脏保护作用已得到充分证实。相比之下,钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)在治疗糖尿病肾病中的疗效仍存在争议。
在本研究中,我们比较了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂依那普利和二氢吡啶类CCB尼伐地平对2型糖尿病啮齿动物模型db/db小鼠肾病的影响。雄性db/db小鼠在11周龄开始治疗时分为以下三组:溶剂对照组、依那普利(每天10 mg/kg)和尼伐地平(每天10 mg/kg)。在17周和27周龄时监测血压、尿液和血液生化指标,并在29周时获取肾脏样本。对过碘酸-希夫染色切片进行形态学变化分析。测定肾脏匀浆中的脂质过氧化。
直到27周,三组血压均保持正常且相似。在整个研究过程中,所有组的血糖均超过300 mg/dl。与溶剂对照组相比,依那普利治疗组和尼伐地平治疗组在27周时微量白蛋白尿的减少分别为37%和52%。依那普利治疗组和尼伐地平治疗组脂质过氧化增加分别被抑制了15%和83%。与溶剂对照组相比,尼伐地平组通过肾小球横截面积评估的肾小球肥大得到显著抑制,而依那普利组则未得到抑制。
在db/db小鼠中,尼伐地平显示出比依那普利更强的肾脏保护作用,且独立于降压作用。脂质过氧化减少所表明的抗氧化作用可能部分有助于尼伐地平赋予的肾脏保护作用。