Healey Jeff, Connolly Stuart J, Morillo Carlos A
Dept. of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Arrhythmia Service, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton (ON), Canada.
Clin Auton Res. 2004 Oct;14 Suppl 1:80-6. doi: 10.1007/s10286-004-1012-2.
Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) is an under recognized cause of recurrent unexplained syncope and potentially of recurrent falls in the elderly. The mechanisms that lead to syncope in patients with CSS remain debated. However, evidence for both peripheral and central alterations have been recently reported. The diagnosis of CSS is challenging and a high clinical suspicion is usually needed to make the diagnosis. Clinical presentation may be typical and characterized by a clear association between accidental manipulation of the carotid sinus and the presentation of syncope. On the other hand, recurrent unexplained syncope and unexplained falls may be the clinical presentation of patients with CSS without a specific trigger. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity documented by carotid sinus massage (CSM) may be the only finding indicating the possibility of CSS as the cause of syncope. In older patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and a negative diagnostic work-up, carotid sinus massage both in the supine and upright positions is recommended. CSS may present primarily as a cardioinhibitory response or a true vasodepressor response. Therapy should address any underlying pathology if present, and be directed to either prevent cardioinhibition, vasodepression or both alterations. A variety of medical therapies have been used with unclear effects. No appropriately designed controlled clinical trials have been performed comparing pacing with medical therapy. Nonetheless, available information indicates that pacing may have a strong beneficial effect and prevents recurrence of syncope in patients with CSS. The present paper critically reviews the latest insights in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of CSS.
颈动脉窦综合征(CSS)是导致不明原因反复晕厥以及老年人反复跌倒的一个未得到充分认识的原因。导致CSS患者晕厥的机制仍存在争议。然而,最近有报道称外周和中枢均有改变的证据。CSS的诊断具有挑战性,通常需要高度的临床怀疑才能做出诊断。临床表现可能很典型,其特征是颈动脉窦意外受刺激与晕厥表现之间有明确关联。另一方面,反复不明原因的晕厥和不明原因的跌倒可能是CSS患者无特定诱因时的临床表现。通过颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)记录的颈动脉窦超敏反应可能是唯一表明CSS可能是晕厥原因的发现。对于反复不明原因晕厥且诊断检查结果为阴性的老年患者,建议在仰卧位和直立位进行颈动脉窦按摩。CSS可能主要表现为心脏抑制反应或真正的血管减压反应。如果存在任何潜在病理情况,治疗应针对该情况,并旨在预防心脏抑制、血管减压或两者的改变。已经使用了多种药物治疗,但效果不明确。尚未进行适当设计的对照临床试验来比较起搏治疗与药物治疗。尽管如此,现有信息表明起搏治疗可能有显著的有益效果,并可预防CSS患者晕厥复发。本文对CSS的病理生理学、诊断和管理方面的最新见解进行了批判性综述。