Suppr超能文献

手辅助腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术的益处:一项对比研究。

Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.

作者信息

Rivadeneira David E, Marcello Peter W, Roberts Patricia L, Rusin Lawrence C, Murray John J, Coller John A, Schoetz David J

机构信息

Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont 01805, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1371-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is thought to facilitate colonic mobilization while maintaining the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Although previous studies of hand-assisted colectomy have focused on segmental colonic resection, the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy has not been investigated. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic approach compared with a conventional laparoscopic method in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.

METHODS

From a prospective database, a consecutive series of patients were identified undergoing conventional and hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and results were compared. Twenty-three patients, comprising 10 hand-assisted and 13 conventional laparoscopic patients, were identified. Patient characteristics, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Both groups were well matched with no differences in age, gender, body mass index, operative indication, diagnosis, comorbidity, or steroid usage. There were no differences among incision size between the hand-assisted (8 (range, 8-20) cm) and conventional laparoscopic cases (8 (range, 5-10) cm). The median operative time was significantly shorter in the hand-assisted group (247 (range, 210-390) minutes) compared with the conventional laparoscopic group (300 (range, 240-400) minutes; P < 0.01). The length of stay was similar between groups (hand-assisted: 4 (range, 3-13) days vs. conventional: 6 (range, 4-17) days). Complications occurred in four hand-assisted patients (40 percent; 2 ileus, mechanical obstruction, and dehydration) and in four patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic method (31 percent; 2 anastomotic leak, ileus, and mechanical obstruction).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy, the hand-assisted method resulted in a significant reduction in operative time without detriment to bowel function, length of stay, or patient outcome. The hand-assisted approach to restorative proctocolectomy is likely to replace conventional laparoscopic methods as the preferred laparoscopic approach for this technically challenging procedure.

摘要

目的

手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术被认为有助于结肠游离,同时保留腹腔镜手术的优势。尽管先前关于手辅助结肠切除术的研究主要集中在节段性结肠切除,但手辅助腹腔镜保留直肠结肠切除术的应用尚未得到研究。本研究评估了在接受保留直肠结肠切除术的患者中,手辅助腹腔镜手术方法与传统腹腔镜方法相比的有效性。

方法

从一个前瞻性数据库中,识别出连续一系列接受传统和手辅助腹腔镜保留直肠结肠切除术的患者,并比较结果。确定了23例患者,其中10例行手辅助手术,13例行传统腹腔镜手术。评估患者特征、围手术期参数和结局。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、手术指征、诊断、合并症或类固醇使用方面均匹配良好,无差异。手辅助组(8(范围8 - 20)cm)和传统腹腔镜组(8(范围5 - 10)cm)的切口大小无差异。手辅助组的中位手术时间(247(范围210 - 390)分钟)明显短于传统腹腔镜组(300(范围240 - 400)分钟;P < 0.01)。两组的住院时间相似(手辅助组:4(范围3 - 13)天 vs. 传统组:6(范围4 - 17)天)。4例手辅助手术患者发生并发症(40%;2例肠梗阻、机械性梗阻和脱水),4例接受传统腹腔镜手术的患者发生并发症(31%;2例吻合口漏、肠梗阻和机械性梗阻)。

结论

与传统腹腔镜保留直肠结肠切除术相比,手辅助方法可显著缩短手术时间,且不损害肠功能、住院时间或患者结局。手辅助保留直肠结肠切除术方法可能会取代传统腹腔镜方法,成为这种技术上具有挑战性的手术的首选腹腔镜手术方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验