• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对1990 - 2000年爱德华国王纪念医院妇产科服务调查的经验教训

Lessons from the inquiry into Obstetrics and Gynaecology services at King Edward Memorial Hospital 1990-2000.

作者信息

McLean Jenny, Walsh Michael

机构信息

Strategic and Special Projects, Bayside Health.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):12-23. doi: 10.1071/ah030012.

DOI:10.1071/ah030012
PMID:15485367
Abstract

The Douglas Inquiry investigated the Obstetrics and Gynaecological services at King Edward Memorial Hospital from 1990-2000. Performance deficiencies were identified at state, board and hospital level contributing to poor outcomes for women, babies and families. The Inquiry raises important issues about clinical governance, leadership and culture, accountability and responsibility, safety and quality systems, staff support and development, and concern for patients and their families. The King Edward, Bristol and Royal Melbourne Hospital inquiries reveal important similarities and key lessons for governments, health care leaders and providers. The health care industry must ensure effective clinical governance supporting a culture of inquiry and open disclosure, and must build rigorous systems to monitor and improve health care safety and quality.

摘要

道格拉斯调查研究了1990年至2000年期间爱德华国王纪念医院的妇产科服务。在州、委员会和医院层面都发现了绩效缺陷,这些缺陷导致妇女、婴儿和家庭的不良结局。该调查提出了有关临床治理、领导力和文化、问责制和责任、安全与质量体系、员工支持与发展以及对患者及其家庭的关怀等重要问题。对爱德华国王医院、布里斯托尔医院和皇家墨尔本医院的调查揭示了对政府、医疗保健领导者和提供者而言重要的相似之处和关键教训。医疗保健行业必须确保有效的临床治理,以支持探究和公开披露的文化,并且必须建立严格的系统来监测和改善医疗保健安全与质量。

相似文献

1
Lessons from the inquiry into Obstetrics and Gynaecology services at King Edward Memorial Hospital 1990-2000.对1990 - 2000年爱德华国王纪念医院妇产科服务调查的经验教训
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):12-23. doi: 10.1071/ah030012.
2
Commentary on the King Edward Inquiry: lessons we fail to learn.对爱德华国王调查的评论:我们未能吸取的教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):28-9. doi: 10.1071/ah030028.
3
Commentary on the King Edward Inquiry: every defect a treasure.对爱德华国王调查的评论:每个缺陷都是一种财富。
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):24-5. doi: 10.1071/ah030024.
4
Commentary on the King Edward Inquiry: coming soon to a theater near you.对爱德华国王调查的评论:即将在您附近的剧院上映。
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):30-3. doi: 10.1071/ah030030.
5
Commentary on the King Edward Inquiry: perspectives from the Chair, Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care.对爱德华国王调查的评论:澳大利亚医疗保健安全与质量理事会主席的观点
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):26-7. doi: 10.1071/ah030026.
6
Do inquiries into health system failures lead to change in clinical governance systems?对卫生系统故障的调查会导致临床治理系统发生改变吗?
Collegian. 2011;18(4):147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2011.06.001.
7
A post-implementation audit of Douglas Inquiry recommendations for medical record structure.对道格拉斯调查关于病历结构建议的实施后审计。
Health Inf Manag. 2004;33(4):127-33. doi: 10.1177/183335830403300405.
8
Lessons learned from measuring safety culture: an Australian case study.从安全文化测量中吸取的教训:澳大利亚案例研究。
Midwifery. 2010 Oct;26(5):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
9
High reliability perinatal units: an approach to the prevention of patient injury and medical malpractice claims.高可靠性围产期护理单元:预防患者伤害和医疗事故索赔的一种方法。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 1999 Spring;19(2):24-32. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.5600190205.
10
Special measures. In control and ready to share: hope emerges from tragedy.特别措施。处于管控之中且准备好分享:希望从悲剧中诞生。
Health Serv J. 2006 Dec 7;116(6035):14-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustaining improvement of hospital-wide initiative for patient safety and quality: a systematic scoping review.持续改进全院范围内的患者安全和质量倡议:系统范围界定审查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002057.
2
Standards for gynecologic surgery.妇科手术标准。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Mar;63(1):7-13. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0405-3. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
3
Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria, Australia.医疗服务质量治理:对澳大利亚维多利亚州卫生服务委员会的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):474-82. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002193. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
Performance reporting for consumers: issues for the Australian private hospital sector.面向消费者的绩效报告:澳大利亚私立医院部门面临的问题
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 May 30;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-5.