Hodges Chris S, Looi Lisa, Cleaver Jamie A S, Ghadiri Mojtaba
Department Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH.
Langmuir. 2004 Oct 26;20(22):9571-6. doi: 10.1021/la035790f.
A simple method for using the JKR model to determine interfacial adhesion between two ideal rough surfaces is demonstrated for individual asperity-asperity and asperity-flat contacts both in air and in water. The model takes into account the effect of a modified contact area at separation due to viscoelastic effects. The equilibrium version of the model significantly underestimates the measured adhesion, whereas the viscoelastic version of the model is much closer to the measured data. The asperity-flat geometry used with the viscoelastic version of the model seems to fit the experimental results best. This was thought to be due to the unlikely occurrence of direct asperity-asperity contacts. Instead, it would seem that the asperities have a far higher chance of fitting between each other on opposing surfaces, leading to correspondingly higher pull-off forces measured on separation. Many possible extensions to the roughness model described here may be made, allowing a much-improved understanding of the contact mechanics between two rough surfaces.
本文展示了一种使用JKR模型来确定两个理想粗糙表面之间界面粘附力的简单方法,该方法适用于空气中和水中单个粗糙峰-粗糙峰以及粗糙峰-平面接触的情况。该模型考虑了分离时由于粘弹性效应而导致的修正接触面积的影响。该模型的平衡版本显著低估了测量的粘附力,而该模型的粘弹性版本则更接近测量数据。与该模型的粘弹性版本一起使用的粗糙峰-平面几何形状似乎最符合实验结果。这被认为是由于不太可能发生直接的粗糙峰-粗糙峰接触。相反,似乎粗糙峰在相对表面上相互适配的机会要高得多,从而导致分离时测量到相应更高的拉脱力。这里描述的粗糙度模型有许多可能的扩展,这将大大有助于更好地理解两个粗糙表面之间的接触力学。