Bierer S Beth, Fishleder Andrew J, Dannefer Elaine, Farrow Nancy, Hull Alan L
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2004 Dec;27(4):410-24. doi: 10.1177/0163278704270006.
To assess the quality of residency education programs at an academic medical center for purposes of enhancing individual graduate medical education programs, we asked residents and fellows (N = 419) to evaluate their training programs using a Web-based questionnaire (response rate = 70%). Kruskal-Wallis tests, factor analysis, correlations, generalizability/decision studies, and mean plots were used to examine trainee responses and to assess the questionnaire's measurement properties. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the instrument had a three-factor structure that correlated highly with overall program rating. Cronbach's alpha exceeded .80 for all factors, and decision studies revealed that 13 to 23 raters were needed to obtain G-coefficients greater than .70. Mean plots showed that the instrument could discriminate within and among training programs at the item level and the factor level, which should help target improvements across graduate training programs within large institutions.
为了评估一所学术医疗中心住院医师培训项目的质量,以改进各个毕业后医学教育项目,我们让住院医师和研究员(N = 419)使用基于网络的问卷对他们的培训项目进行评估(回复率 = 70%)。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、因子分析、相关性分析、概化/决策研究和均值图来检查学员的回答,并评估问卷的测量属性。探索性因子分析表明,该工具具有三因素结构,与项目总体评分高度相关。所有因素的Cronbach's α均超过0.80,决策研究表明,需要13至23名评分者才能获得大于0.70的G系数。均值图显示,该工具能够在项目层面和因子层面区分不同培训项目内部及之间的差异,这有助于针对大型机构内的毕业后培训项目进行改进。