Kidwell Chelsea S, Chalela Julio A, Saver Jeffrey L, Starkman Sidney, Hill Michael D, Demchuk Andrew M, Butman John A, Patronas Nicholas, Alger Jeffry R, Latour Lawrence L, Luby Marie L, Baird Alison E, Leary Megan C, Tremwel Margaret, Ovbiagele Bruce, Fredieu Andre, Suzuki Shuichi, Villablanca J Pablo, Davis Stephen, Dunn Billy, Todd Jason W, Ezzeddine Mustapha A, Haymore Joseph, Lynch John K, Davis Lisa, Warach Steven
UCLA Stroke Center, Los Angeles, Calif, USA.
JAMA. 2004 Oct 20;292(15):1823-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.15.1823.
Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) is the standard brain imaging study for the initial evaluation of patients with acute stroke symptoms. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an alternative to CT in the emergency stroke setting. However, the accuracy of MRI relative to CT for the detection of hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage has not been demonstrated.
To compare the accuracy of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage in patients presenting with acute focal stroke symptoms.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective, multicenter study was performed at 2 stroke centers (UCLA Medical Center and Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, Md), between October 2000 and February 2003. Patients presenting with focal stroke symptoms within 6 hours of onset underwent brain MRI followed by noncontrast CT.
Acute intracerebral hemorrhage and any intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosed on gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRI and CT scans by a consensus of 4 blinded readers.
The study was stopped early, after 200 patients were enrolled, when it became apparent at the time of an unplanned interim analysis that MRI was detecting cases of hemorrhagic transformation not detected by CT. For the diagnosis of any hemorrhage, MRI was positive in 71 patients with CT positive in 29 (P<.001). For the diagnosis of acute hemorrhage, MRI and CT were equivalent (96% concordance). Acute hemorrhage was diagnosed in 25 patients on both MRI and CT. In 4 other patients, acute hemorrhage was present on MRI but not on the corresponding CT--each of these 4 cases was interpreted as hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic infarct. In 3 patients, regions interpreted as acute hemorrhage on CT were interpreted as chronic hemorrhage on MRI. In 1 patient, subarachnoid hemorrhage was diagnosed on CT but not on MRI. In 49 patients, chronic hemorrhage, most often microbleeds, was visualized on MRI but not on CT.
MRI may be as accurate as CT for the detection of acute hemorrhage in patients presenting with acute focal stroke symptoms and is more accurate than CT for the detection of chronic intracerebral hemorrhage.
非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)是对有急性卒中症状患者进行初始评估的标准脑部成像检查。多模态磁共振成像(MRI)已被提议作为急诊卒中情况下CT的替代方法。然而,MRI相对于CT在检测超急性脑出血方面的准确性尚未得到证实。
比较MRI和CT在检测出现急性局灶性卒中症状患者急性脑出血方面的准确性。
设计、地点和患者:2000年10月至2003年2月在2个卒中中心(加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校医疗中心和马里兰州贝塞斯达的郊区医院)进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。发病6小时内出现局灶性卒中症状的患者先进行脑部MRI检查,随后进行非增强CT检查。
由4名盲法阅片者达成共识,根据梯度回波(GRE)MRI和CT扫描诊断急性脑出血和任何脑出血。
在纳入200例患者后,该研究提前终止,因为在计划外的中期分析时发现MRI能检测出CT未检测到的出血转化病例。对于任何出血的诊断,MRI诊断为阳性的有71例,CT诊断为阳性的有29例(P<0.001)。对于急性出血的诊断,MRI和CT相当(一致性为96%)。MRI和CT均诊断出25例急性出血。在另外4例患者中,MRI显示有急性出血而相应CT未显示——这4例中的每一例均被解释为缺血性梗死的出血转化。在3例患者中,CT上被解释为急性出血的区域在MRI上被解释为慢性出血。在1例患者中,CT诊断为蛛网膜下腔出血而MRI未诊断出。在49例患者中,MRI显示有慢性出血,最常见的是微出血,而CT未显示。
对于出现急性局灶性卒中症状的患者,MRI在检测急性出血方面可能与CT一样准确,且在检测慢性脑出血方面比CT更准确。