Kang Chris, Mehta Pritesh, Chang Yi S, Bhadelia Rafeeque A, Rojas Rafael, Wintermark Max, Andre Jalal B, Yang Ethan, Selim Magdy, Thomas Ajith J, Filippidis Aristotelis, Wen Yan, Spincemaille Pascal, Forkert Nils D, Wang Yi, Soman Salil
Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 1 Deaconess Road, Rosenberg B90A, 02215, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec 17. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01478-0.
Accurate detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) is important for detection of multiple conditions. However, CMBs can be challenging to identify on MR images, especially for distinguishing CMBs from the mimic of calcification. We performed a comparative reader study to assess the diagnostic performance of two primary MR sequences for differentiating CMBs from calcification.
Under IRB approved exempt retrospective protocol, 49 adult patients with identifiable intracranial hemorrhage who underwent multi-echo 3D Gradient Recall Echo (GRE) using 3T MRI were non-sequentially recruited under a retrospective IRB approved protocol. Multi-echo complex total field inversion quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility weighted imaging/phase (SWI/P) images were generated for all patients. 53 lesion ROIs were identified and classified on provided images by an expert panel of three neuroradiologists as either: CMB, Blood, Calcification, or Other. Three additional neuroradiologists subsequently reviewed the same SWI/P and QSM images in independent sessions and designated lesions as either blood and/or calcification using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, on lesion classification and reader diagnostic accuracy, reader confidence-level, reader agreement-level, and the predictability of mean susceptibility values between SWI/P and QSM were conducted with logistic regression and calculation of Fleiss' κ, Kendall's w, Krippendorff's α.
Across all qualitative assessment and quantitative metrics measured (simple accuracy, confidence as degree of ground truth alignment, and inter-rater agreement) QSM outperformed SWI/P. Additionally, logistic regression of average QSM voxel susceptibility achieved near-perfect separation in differentiating between CMB and calcification in the limited number of CMB/Calcification ROIs, indicating a high predictability.
Our study demonstrates that QSM offers improved detectability and classification of CMBs compared to the conventionally utilized SWI/P sequence. In addition, QSM simplifies the interpretation workflow by reducing the number of requisite images compared with the conventional counterpart, with improved diagnostic confidence.
准确检测脑微出血(CMB)对于多种疾病的检测至关重要。然而,在磁共振成像(MR)图像上识别CMB可能具有挑战性,尤其是将CMB与钙化伪影区分开来。我们进行了一项比较阅片者研究,以评估两种主要MR序列区分CMB与钙化的诊断性能。
在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的豁免回顾性方案下,根据回顾性IRB批准的方案,非连续招募了49例接受3T MRI多回波三维梯度回波(GRE)检查且有可识别颅内出血的成年患者。为所有患者生成了多回波复合全场反转定量磁化率成像(QSM)和磁化率加权成像/相位(SWI/P)图像。由三位神经放射科医生组成的专家小组在提供的图像上识别并分类了53个病变感兴趣区(ROI),分为:CMB、血液、钙化或其他。随后,另外三位神经放射科医生在独立的会议中审查相同的SWI/P和QSM图像,并使用5点李克特量表将病变指定为血液和/或钙化。对病变分类、阅片者诊断准确性、阅片者置信度、阅片者一致性以及SWI/P和QSM之间平均磁化率值的可预测性进行了统计分析,采用逻辑回归并计算Fleiss'κ、Kendall's w、Krippendorff'sα。
在所有定性评估和定量指标(简单准确性、与真实情况相符程度的置信度以及阅片者间一致性)方面,QSM均优于SWI/P。此外,在有限数量的CMB/钙化ROI中,平均QSM体素磁化率的逻辑回归在区分CMB和钙化方面实现了近乎完美的分离,表明具有较高的可预测性。
我们的研究表明,与传统使用的SWI/P序列相比,QSM在CMB的检测和分类方面具有更高的性能。此外,与传统方法相比,QSM通过减少所需图像数量简化了解读流程,并提高了诊断置信度。