Suppr超能文献

痴呆症诊断途径:跨种族差异的证据

Pathways to dementia diagnosis: evidence for cross-ethnic differences.

作者信息

Hinton Ladson, Franz Carol, Friend Jeffrey

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004 Jul-Sep;18(3):134-44. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000127444.23312.ff.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The diagnosis of dementia often occurs well after the onset of the disease. Studies of help-seeking behavior may help illuminate why delays occur.

SPECIFIC AIMS

(1) To describe pathways to diagnosis from the perspective of family caregivers and (2) to compare help-seeking patterns and experiences across three ethnic groups.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 39 ethnically diverse family dementia caregivers. Interviews were coded for help-seeking events (initial help-seeking, referrals to secondary helpers, and site of final diagnosis), pathway types, and adverse experiences within the healthcare system along pathways to diagnosis.

RESULTS

Help-seeking was most often initiated by family members or formal care providers (ie, healthcare providers or social workers), usually in outpatient primary care settings but also elsewhere (eg, social service agencies, hospitals). "Secondary" formal helpers were often involved, usually through self-referral by families rather than by healthcare providers. While most families reported receiving a "final" diagnosis, a small minority of predominantly Chinese-American families did not. Four distinct pathways to diagnosis were identified and found to vary significantly (p < 0.03) across the three ethnic groups, which we label as smooth pathways, crisis events pathways, fragmented pathways, and dead-end pathways. Adverse experiences in the healthcare system were common and included unsatisfactory diagnosis disclosure and explanation, inadequate workup, uncaring or insensitive attitude, language barriers, and discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-ethnic differences were found in both pathway types and in adverse experiences.

摘要

未加标注

痴呆症的诊断通常在疾病发作后很久才进行。对寻求帮助行为的研究可能有助于阐明延迟发生的原因。

具体目标

(1)从家庭护理人员的角度描述诊断途径,以及(2)比较三个种族群体的求助模式和经历。

方法

对39名不同种族的痴呆症家庭护理人员进行了半结构化定性访谈。对访谈内容进行编码,以了解求助事件(首次求助、转介给二级帮助者以及最终诊断地点)、途径类型以及诊断途径中医疗系统内的不良经历。

结果

求助最常由家庭成员或正式护理提供者(即医疗保健提供者或社会工作者)发起,通常是在门诊初级保健环境中,但也在其他地方(如社会服务机构、医院)。“二级”正式帮助者经常参与,通常是通过家庭自我转介,而不是医疗保健提供者的转介。虽然大多数家庭报告得到了“最终”诊断,但一小部分主要是华裔美国人的家庭没有。确定了四条不同的诊断途径,发现这四条途径在三个种族群体中存在显著差异(p < 0.03),我们将其标记为顺畅途径、危机事件途径、碎片化途径和死胡同途径。医疗系统中的不良经历很常见,包括诊断披露和解释不令人满意、检查不充分、态度冷漠或麻木不仁、语言障碍和歧视。

结论

在途径类型和不良经历方面都发现了跨种族差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验