Rinkel G J E, Feigin V L, Algra A, van Gijn J
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508 GA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD000483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000483.pub2.
Secondary ischaemia is a frequent complication after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), and responsible for a substantial proportion of patients with poor outcome after SAH. The cause of secondary ischaemia is unknown, but hypovolaemia and fluid restriction are important risk factors. Therefore, volume expansion therapy (hypervolaemia) is frequently used in patients with SAH to prevent or treat secondary ischaemia.
To determine the effectiveness of volume expansion therapy for improving outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched September 2003). In addition we searched MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2004) and contacted trialists to identify further published and unpublished studies.
All randomised controlled trials of volume expansion therapy in patients with aneurysmal SAH. We also sought controlled trials based on consecutive groups of patients quasi-randomly allocated to treatment or control group and included these in the analysis if the two groups were well comparable with regard to major prognostic factors.
Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information.
We identified three trials. One truly randomised trial and one quasi-randomised trial with comparable baseline characteristics for both groups were included in the analyses. Volume expansion therapy did not improve outcome (Relative Risk (RR) 1.0; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.5 to 2.2), nor the occurrence of secondary ischaemia (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5 to 2.2). Hypervolaemia tended to increase the rate of complications (RR 1.8; 95% CI 0.9 to 3.7) In another quasi-randomised trial, outcome assessment was done only at the day of operation (7 to 10 days after SAH). In the period before operation, treatment resulted in a reduction of secondary ischaemia (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) and case fatality (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.2).
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of volume expansion therapy have been studied properly in only two trials of patients with aneurysmal SAH, with very small numbers. At present, there is no sound evidence for the use of volume expansion therapy in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
继发性缺血是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后常见的并发症,是导致SAH患者预后不良的重要原因。继发性缺血的病因尚不清楚,但血容量不足和液体限制是重要的危险因素。因此,扩容治疗(高血容量)常用于SAH患者以预防或治疗继发性缺血。
确定扩容治疗对改善动脉瘤性SAH患者预后的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane卒中组试验注册库(最近一次检索时间为2003年9月)。此外,我们检索了MEDLINE(1966年至2004年1月)和EMBASE(1980年至2004年1月),并与试验研究者联系以识别更多已发表和未发表的研究。
所有关于动脉瘤性SAH患者扩容治疗的随机对照试验。我们还寻找了基于连续患者组进行准随机分配至治疗组或对照组的对照试验,并在两组主要预后因素具有良好可比性时将其纳入分析。
两名评价者独立提取数据并评估试验质量。与试验研究者联系以获取缺失信息。
我们识别出三项试验。分析纳入了一项真正的随机试验和一项两组基线特征可比的准随机试验。扩容治疗未改善预后(相对危险度(RR)1.0;95%置信区间(CI)0.5至2.2),也未降低继发性缺血的发生率(RR 1.1;95%CI 0.5至2.2)。高血容量有增加并发症发生率的趋势(RR 1.8;95%CI 0.9至3.7)。在另一项准随机试验中,仅在手术当天(SAH后7至10天)进行预后评估。在手术前阶段,治疗使继发性缺血减少(RR 0.33;95%CI 0.11至0.99),病死率降低(RR 0.20;95%CI 0.07至1.2)。
仅在两项针对动脉瘤性SAH患者的小规模试验中对扩容治疗的效果进行了恰当研究。目前,尚无充分证据支持在动脉瘤性SAH患者中使用扩容治疗。