Katz Eric, Larsen L Scott, Fogarty Charles M, Hamed Kamal, Song James, Choudhri Shurjeel
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;27(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.02.023.
To compare the efficacy of sequential i.v. to p.o. moxifloxacin with ceftriaxone +/- azithromycin +/- metronidazole for the treatment of patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP), a multi-centered, prospective, randomized, open label study was performed. CAP patients were randomized to moxifloxacin (400 mg/d-at least one i.v. dose) or ceftriaxone (at least one dose of 2 g i.v. q.d. followed by cefuroxime 500 mg p.o. b.i.d.) +/- azithromycin, +/- metronidazole (cephalosporin/macrolide control: CMC). The primary endpoint was clinical response at test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Bacteriological response at TOC was the secondary endpoint. Clinical cure was found in 83.3% (90/108) of moxifloxacin patients and 79.6% (90/113) of control patients. Microbiological responses were 81.8% (18/22) for moxifloxacin and 60.7% (17/28) for CMC patients. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 18.0% of moxifloxacin and 16% of CMC patients. It is concluded that i.v. to p.o. moxifloxacin is as effective as CMC for treatment of CAP and is a reliable alternative antimicrobial therapy.
为比较序贯静脉注射改为口服莫西沙星与头孢曲松+/-阿奇霉素+/-甲硝唑治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的疗效,开展了一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究。将CAP患者随机分为莫西沙星组(400mg/天,至少一剂静脉注射)或头孢曲松组(至少一剂2g静脉注射,每日一次,随后口服头孢呋辛500mg,每日两次)+/-阿奇霉素,+/-甲硝唑(头孢菌素/大环内酯对照组:CMC)。主要终点是治愈检查(TOC)访视时的临床反应。TOC时的细菌学反应是次要终点。莫西沙星组83.3%(90/108)的患者和对照组79.6%(90/113)的患者实现临床治愈。莫西沙星组的微生物学反应率为81.8%(18/22),CMC组为60.7%(17/28)。莫西沙星组18.0%的患者和CMC组16%的患者发生药物相关不良事件。结论是,静脉注射改为口服莫西沙星治疗CAP与CMC同样有效,是一种可靠的替代抗菌治疗方法。