Cerca Nuno, Pier Gerald B, Oliveira Rosário, Azeredo Joana
Centro de Engenharia Biológica, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Res Microbiol. 2004 Nov;155(9):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.06.005.
The main goal of this work was to evaluate the adhesion to acrylic of several clinical strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus using both static and dynamic adhesion methods, and to compare the results obtained with these two methods. Adhesion was evaluated using the static slide method with different washing procedures, and the parallel plate flow chamber method. The extent of S. epidermidis adhesion, assessed by both methods, was greater than that of S. haemolyticus. The number of bacteria which adhered using the static method was lower than that using the dynamic method. It was found that the simple static method, when performed with an accurate washing procedure, can be as effective as the dynamic flow method for assessing differences in the adherence capacity of strains. Although the dynamic flow method yielded more overall information, its greater complexity and cost may not always justify its use for certain experimental comparisons. This investigation has shown that simple static adhesion methods, when performed accurately, can be used to evaluate differences in adhesion capacity.
这项工作的主要目标是使用静态和动态黏附方法评估几种表皮葡萄球菌和溶血葡萄球菌临床菌株对丙烯酸的黏附情况,并比较这两种方法所获得的结果。使用具有不同洗涤程序的静态载玻片法和平行板流动腔法评估黏附情况。通过两种方法评估,表皮葡萄球菌的黏附程度均高于溶血葡萄球菌。使用静态方法黏附的细菌数量低于使用动态方法的数量。结果发现,当采用精确的洗涤程序时,简单的静态方法在评估菌株黏附能力差异方面可与动态流动方法一样有效。尽管动态流动方法能提供更多的总体信息,但其更高的复杂性和成本可能并不总是使其适用于某些实验比较。这项研究表明,精确执行的简单静态黏附方法可用于评估黏附能力的差异。