Wang Jian-Liu, Zheng Bi-Ying, Li Xi-Dan, Nokelainen Kristiina, Angström Tord, Lindström Mikael S, Wallin Keng-Ling
Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mod Pathol. 2005 May;18(5):629-37. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800308.
Human papillomavirus is known to play an important etiological role in the genesis of cervical cancer, but only a very small proportion of infected women develop invasive cervical cancer. The purpose of cervical cancer prevention is early diagnosis of its precursors. The molecular detection of human papillomavirus DNA as a diagnostic test to cervical carcinogenesis gave a low positive predictive value as compared to the use of biomarkers. p16INK4A and possibly p14ARF have been proposed as putative surrogate biomarkers that would allow identification of dysplastic cervical epithelia. Serial consecutive biopsies representing normal cervical epithelium to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and/or invasive cervical cancer were stained with immunohistochemistry for p16INK4A, p14ARF and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. The positive rates of these markers were significantly higher in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and in squamous cell carcinoma than in normal cervix (P<0.01). No significant difference was noted between lesions progressing from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to squamous cell carcinoma for both p16INK4A and p14ARF expression (P>0.05). For both biomarkers, nuclear staining was predominantly seen. However, the cytoplasmic stain of p16INK4A increased with disease progression and the pattern of expression varied between different tumors and its location within the lesion. Both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining with p16INK4A and p14ARF of affected epithelial cells were considered positive. In the adjacent normal tissue to cervical neoplasia, the positive rates of p16INK4A, p14ARF and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression were higher than those found distant to these lesions but the findings did not reach statistical significance. No correlation was seen between the human papillomavirus types detected and the expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF. In conclusion, overexpression of p16INK4A and p14ARF act as potential biomarkers for cervical cancer progression from premalignant lesions.
已知人乳头瘤病毒在宫颈癌的发生中起重要的病因学作用,但只有极少数感染女性会发展为浸润性宫颈癌。宫颈癌预防的目的是早期诊断其癌前病变。与人乳头瘤病毒DNA的分子检测作为宫颈癌发生的诊断试验相比,使用生物标志物时其阳性预测值较低。p16INK4A以及可能的p14ARF已被提出作为假定的替代生物标志物,可用于识别发育异常的宫颈上皮。对代表正常宫颈上皮至宫颈上皮内瘤变和/或浸润性宫颈癌的连续系列活检组织进行p16INK4A、p14ARF和增殖细胞核抗原的免疫组织化学染色。这些标志物的阳性率在宫颈上皮内瘤变和鳞状细胞癌中显著高于正常宫颈(P<0.01)。对于从宫颈上皮内瘤变进展为鳞状细胞癌的病变,p16INK4A和p14ARF的表达均未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。对于这两种生物标志物,主要可见细胞核染色。然而,p16INK4A的细胞质染色随疾病进展而增加,并且表达模式在不同肿瘤及其在病变内的位置之间有所不同。受影响上皮细胞的p16INK4A和p14ARF的细胞核和细胞质染色均被视为阳性。在宫颈肿瘤的相邻正常组织中,p16INK4A、p14ARF和增殖细胞核抗原表达的阳性率高于远离这些病变处的组织,但这些结果未达到统计学意义。未观察到检测到的人乳头瘤病毒类型与p16INK4a和p14ARF的表达之间存在相关性。总之,p16INK4A和p14ARF的过表达可作为宫颈癌从癌前病变进展的潜在生物标志物。