Soyka Michael, Winter Catja, Kagerer Sabine, Brunnauer Manfred, Laux Gerd, Möller Hans-Jürgen
Psychiatric Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Naussbaumstrasse 7, D-80336 Munich, Germany.
J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.04.006.
The effects of antipsychotic treatment on the psychomotor performance and driving ability of schizophrenic patients is subject of investigation. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of an atypical neuroleptic (risperidone) in comparison to a conventional dopamine antagonist neuroleptic (haloperidol) on several dimensions of psychomotor performance (visual perception, attention, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance) considered to be of relevance in evaluating driving fitness. Psychomotor performance was assessed by means of the ART 90 (act-and-react test), a computerized test battery which is frequently used in diagnosis of psychomotor performance. The 40 participating patients were examined at discharge following psychopathological stabilisation; 20 received haloperidol medication, 20 received the atypical neuroleptic risperidone. Nineteen healthy individuals were studied as a control group. Our findings indicate a remarkably reduced psychomotor performance in both groups of schizophrenic patients compared to healthy controls. We did find a significant but low correlation between age and some items of the RST3 and between age and the tracking performance on the PVT. The younger patients showed a better test performance than older patients. The BPRS-score was significantly correlated with only two items of the RST3. However, patients under treatment with risperidone showed significantly better results compared to patients treated with haloperidol. Only one (5%) subject passed all subtests without major failures and could be regarded as competent to drive. Among patients with risperidone, seven patients (35%) passed all test parameters without major failures. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
抗精神病药物治疗对精神分裂症患者精神运动表现及驾驶能力的影响是研究的主题。本研究旨在评估一种非典型抗精神病药物(利培酮)与传统多巴胺拮抗剂抗精神病药物(氟哌啶醇)相比,对被认为与评估驾驶适宜性相关的几个精神运动表现维度(视觉感知、注意力、反应时间和感觉运动表现)的影响。精神运动表现通过ART 90(行动与反应测试)进行评估,这是一种常用于诊断精神运动表现的计算机化测试组合。40名参与研究的患者在精神病理状态稳定后出院时接受检查;20名患者接受氟哌啶醇药物治疗,20名患者接受非典型抗精神病药物利培酮治疗。19名健康个体作为对照组进行研究。我们的研究结果表明,与健康对照组相比,两组精神分裂症患者的精神运动表现均显著降低。我们确实发现年龄与RST3的某些项目之间以及年龄与PVT上的跟踪表现之间存在显著但较低的相关性。年轻患者的测试表现优于老年患者。BPRS评分仅与RST3的两个项目显著相关。然而,与接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者相比,接受利培酮治疗的患者表现出显著更好的结果。只有一名(5%)受试者通过了所有子测试且无重大失误,可被视为有驾驶能力。本文讨论了这些发现的临床意义。