Berg Hans F, Tjhie Jeroen H T, Scheffer Gert-Jan, Peeters Marcel F, van Keulen Peter H J, Kluytmans Jan A J W, Stobberingh Ellen E
Department of Clinical Microbiology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, P. O. Box 747, 5000 AS Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Nov;48(11):4183-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4183-4188.2004.
To investigate the effect of slow-release (SR) clarithromycin on colonization and the development of resistance in oropharyngeal and nasal flora, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed with 8 weeks of follow-up. A total of 296 patients with documented coronary artery disease were randomized in the preoperative outpatient clinic to receive a daily dose of SR clarithromycin (500 mg) (CL group) or placebo tablets (PB group) until the day of surgery. Nose and throat swabs were taken before the start of therapy, directly after the end of therapy, and 8 weeks later. The presence of potential pathogenic bacteria was determined, and if they were isolated, MIC testing was performed. Quantitative culture on media with and without macrolides was performed for the indigenous oropharyngeal flora. In addition, analysis of the mechanism of resistance was performed with the macrolide-resistant indigenous flora. Basic patient characteristics were comparable in the two treatment groups. The average number of tablets taken was 15 (standard deviation = 6.4). From the throat swabs, Haemophilus parainfluenzae was isolated and carriage was not affected in either of the treatment groups. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, however, was significantly reduced in the CL group (from 35.3 to 4.3%) compared to the PB group (from 32.4 to 30.3%) (P < 0.0001; relative risk [RR], 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 16.0). Resistance to clarithromycin was present significantly more frequently in H. parainfluenzae in the CL group after treatment (P = 0.007; RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3); also, the percentage of patients with resistance to macrolides in the indigenous flora after treatment was significantly higher in the CL group (31 to 69%) (P < 0.0001; RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). This persisted for at least 8 weeks. This study shows that besides the effective elimination of nasal carriage of S. aureus, treatment with SR clarithromycin for approximately 2 weeks has a marked and sustained effect on the development of resistance in the oropharyngeal flora for at least 8 weeks.
为研究缓释克拉霉素对口咽部和鼻腔菌群定植及耐药性发展的影响,进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,并随访8周。共有296例确诊为冠状动脉疾病的患者在术前门诊被随机分组,分别接受每日剂量的缓释克拉霉素(500mg)(CL组)或安慰剂片(PB组),直至手术当日。在治疗开始前、治疗结束后即刻以及8周后采集鼻拭子和咽拭子。检测潜在病原菌的存在情况,若分离出病原菌,则进行最低抑菌浓度(MIC)检测。对口咽部固有菌群在含和不含大环内酯类药物的培养基上进行定量培养。此外,对耐大环内酯类的口咽部固有菌群进行耐药机制分析。两个治疗组的患者基本特征具有可比性。平均服药片数为15片(标准差 = 6.4)。从咽拭子中分离出副流感嗜血杆菌,两个治疗组中该菌的携带情况均未受影响。然而,与PB组(从32.4%降至30.3%)相比,CL组金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔携带率显著降低(从35.3%降至4.3%)(P < 0.0001;相对危险度[RR],7.0;95%置信区间[CI],3.1至16.0)。治疗后CL组副流感嗜血杆菌对克拉霉素的耐药率显著更高(P = 0.007;RR,1.6;95%CI,1.1至2.3);而且,治疗后CL组固有菌群对大环内酯类耐药的患者百分比显著更高(从31%升至69%)(P < 0.0001;RR,1.9;95%CI,1.4至2.5)。这种情况至少持续8周。本研究表明,除有效消除金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔携带外,约2周的缓释克拉霉素治疗对口咽部菌群耐药性的发展具有显著且持续至少8周的影响。