Hunt G J
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK.
J Radiol Prot. 2004 Sep;24(3):265-72. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/24/3/005.
Since the 1960s, the methodology recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for assessment of individual doses has developed significantly, yet the specific recommendations related to the characteristics of 'critical groups' for the purposes of protection of the public have been interpreted but are relatively unchanged. This paper examines developments relevant to the criteria for appropriate homogeneity of habits within critical groups. It is suggested that, with the need for additivity of effective doses summed over different contributing exposure pathways, an important criterion for selection of the critical group is homogeneity of summed effective doses rather than, necessarily, of the underlying factors such as ages and habits focusing on a particular pathway. This implies that there need be less emphasis than before on the term 'critical pathway'. However, examples of recent retrospective assessments near UK nuclear establishments are given and it is shown that, in practice, critical groups selected on the basis of summed effective doses are still fairly homogeneous in terms of detailed habits.
自20世纪60年代以来,国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)推荐的用于评估个人剂量的方法有了显著发展,但出于公众保护目的与“关键人群组”特征相关的具体建议虽有解读,但相对未变。本文探讨了与关键人群组内适当同质性标准相关的发展情况。有人认为,鉴于不同贡献暴露途径的有效剂量相加的必要性,选择关键人群组的一个重要标准是相加有效剂量的同质性,而不一定是诸如关注特定途径的年龄和习惯等潜在因素的同质性。这意味着对“关键途径”一词的强调应比以前少。然而,文中给出了英国核设施附近近期回顾性评估的例子,结果表明,实际上,基于相加有效剂量选择的关键人群组在详细习惯方面仍然相当同质。