Jones Glenn, Savage Elizabeth, Hall Jane
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Oct;9 Suppl 2:63-8. doi: 10.1258/1355819042349899.
In the Australian Medicare system, general practitioners (GPs) are paid on a fee-for-service basis. A practitioner can choose to bill the government directly (termed bulk billing) and receive 85% of a regulated fee as full payment. Bulk billed consultations are free to the patient. However, GPs are free to charge above the regulated fee. The patient can then claim a rebate from the government but only the equivalent of 85% of the regulated Medicare fee. Such copayments for GP consultations cannot be covered by private health insurance. In the ten years following the introduction of Medicare in 1984, the bulk billing rate for GP consultations steadily increased to 84%. Since then the rate has fallen to below 68%. In April 2003 the Minister for Health announced a reform package under the title A Fairer Medicare which aimed, among other things, to increase the availability of bulk billing for some patients. A key feature of the proposal involved changes to the way that GPs are reimbursed. Following political opposition that would have prevented it passing both houses of the federal parliament, a revised version, MedicarePlus, was released in November 2003. This paper describes the factors influencing a GP's choice to bulk bill and examines the two proposals, in this context.
在澳大利亚医疗保险系统中,全科医生按服务收费制获取报酬。从业者可以选择直接向政府计费(即批量计费),并获得规定费用85%的全额支付。接受批量计费的诊疗对患者免费。然而,全科医生可以自行收取高于规定费用的金额。患者随后可向政府申请回扣,但回扣金额仅相当于医疗保险规定费用的85%。全科医生诊疗的此类自付费用不能由私人医疗保险支付。1984年引入医疗保险后的十年间,全科医生诊疗的批量计费率稳步上升至84%。自那以后,该比率已降至68%以下。2003年4月,卫生部长宣布了一项名为“更公平的医疗保险”的改革方案,其目标之一是提高部分患者获得批量计费服务的可能性。该提案的一个关键特征涉及全科医生报销方式的改变。由于遭到政治反对,该提案未能在联邦议会两院通过,2003年11月发布了修订版“医疗保险升级版”。本文描述了影响全科医生选择批量计费的因素,并在此背景下审视这两项提案。