Wilde Nancy J, Strauss Esther, Tulsky David S
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3050, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3P5.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Jun;26(4):539-49. doi: 10.1080/13803390490496605.
This study had two goals. One was to assess whether the WMS-III Spatial Span subtest operates as a visual analogue of Digit Span while the second was to determine whether backward span is a more sensitive measure of working memory than the forward span condition. Analyses based on the WAIS-III-WMS-III standardization and clinical group data revealed some important distinctions between Digit and Spatial Span. The two tasks exhibited differences in patterns of performance on the forward versus backward conditions, in their relationships with age, and in their methodology. Moreover, the backward conditions of both Digit and Spatial Span did not appear more affected by risk factors such as aging or pathology than the forward scores. This runs contrary to the widespread notion that backward span provides differential sensitivity regarding working memory processing.
本研究有两个目标。一是评估韦氏记忆量表第三版(WMS - III)的空间广度分测验是否作为数字广度的视觉类似物发挥作用,二是确定倒序广度是否比正序广度条件更能敏感地测量工作记忆。基于韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS - III) - 韦氏记忆量表第三版的标准化和临床组数据进行的分析揭示了数字广度和空间广度之间的一些重要差异。这两项任务在正序与倒序条件下的表现模式、与年龄的关系以及方法学上都存在差异。此外,数字广度和空间广度的倒序条件似乎并不比正序分数更容易受到衰老或病理等风险因素的影响。这与普遍认为的倒序广度在工作记忆处理方面具有差异敏感性的观点相悖。