• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术支架比未覆膜支架能维持更低的门静脉压力,且需要更少的再次干预。

Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stents maintain lower portal pressure and require fewer reinterventions than uncovered stents.

作者信息

Ockenga J, Kroencke T J, Schuetz T, Plauth M, Kasim E, Petersein J, Schmidt H H-J, Lochs H

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;39(10):994-9. doi: 10.1080/00365520410003443.

DOI:10.1080/00365520410003443
PMID:15513340
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patency, functional and haemodynamic results of expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with an ePTFE-covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent (TIPSS) were prospectively evaluated at 6 and 12 months and compared with matched controls with mesh-wire uncovered TIPSS.

RESULTS

At 6 months, ePTFE-TIPSS showed a significantly lower porto-caval pressure gradient (PCPG) (9 (3-21) mmHg, P = 0.006), a lower rate of dysfunction (8% versus 54%, P = 0.03) and required fewer reinterventions (2 versus 13, P = 0.02); similar results were obtained after 12 months. This resulted in a reduction in the median cost for angiographic surveillance in the covered TIPSS group at 6 and 12 months (36% and 56% compared to the uncovered TIPSS group, P = 0.002), but total procedure-related costs were higher with the ePTFE-TIPSS (6 months: 3730 (3245-6759) versus 1850 (1466-5479) euro/patient; 12 months: 3945 (3460-6759) versus 2295 (1728-5694) euro/patient) due to the higher initial cost of the ePTFE-covered TIPSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The insertion of ePTFE-covered TIPSS results in better maintenance of lowered portal pressure and fewer reinterventions in patients with liver cirrhosis. There is strong evidence that the use of ePTFE-TIPSS does not require regular surveillance to maintain primary patency, which may then improve cost-effectiveness.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估肝硬化患者中,膨体聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的通畅性、功能及血流动力学结果。

方法

对13例植入ePTFE覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术支架(TIPSS)的患者进行了6个月和12个月的前瞻性评估,并与匹配的未覆膜金属丝TIPSS对照组进行比较。

结果

6个月时,ePTFE-TIPSS的门静脉-腔静脉压力梯度(PCPG)显著更低(9(3-21)mmHg,P = 0.006),功能障碍发生率更低(8%对54%,P = 0.03),再次干预需求更少(2次对13次,P = 0.02);12个月后得到了相似结果。这使得覆膜TIPSS组6个月和12个月时血管造影监测的中位成本降低(与未覆膜TIPSS组相比分别降低36%和56%,P = 0.002),但ePTFE-TIPSS的总手术相关成本更高(6个月:3730(3245-6759)欧元/患者对1850(1466-5479)欧元/患者;12个月:3945(3460-6759)欧元/患者对2295(1728-5694)欧元/患者),因为ePTFE覆膜TIPSS的初始成本更高。

结论

植入ePTFE覆膜TIPSS能更好地维持肝硬化患者降低的门静脉压力,减少再次干预。有强有力的证据表明,使用ePTFE-TIPSS不需要定期监测来维持初期通畅性,这可能会提高成本效益。

相似文献

1
Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stents maintain lower portal pressure and require fewer reinterventions than uncovered stents.覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术支架比未覆膜支架能维持更低的门静脉压力,且需要更少的再次干预。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;39(10):994-9. doi: 10.1080/00365520410003443.
2
Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction in PTFE-covered stent-grafts versus bare stents.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架移植物与裸支架治疗经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jul;55(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.007.
3
Uncovering the truth about covered stents: is there a difference between covered versus uncovered stents with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts?揭开覆膜支架的真相:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的覆膜支架与非覆膜支架有区别吗?
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):561-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.021. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
4
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt: technical factors and new developments.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术:技术因素与新进展。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Nov;18(11):1127-33. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000236871.78280.a7.
5
Comparison study of Doppler ultrasound surveillance of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent versus bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术中膨体聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸支架的多普勒超声监测对比研究
J Clin Ultrasound. 2010 Sep;38(7):353-60. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20709.
6
Is sonographic surveillance of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) necessary? A single centre experience comparing both types of stents.对聚四氟乙烯覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)进行超声监测是否必要?一项比较两种类型支架的单中心经验。
Clin Radiol. 2008 Oct;63(10):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.04.016. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
7
Restoration of liver function and portosystemic pressure gradient after TIPSS and late TIPSS occlusion.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSS)及晚期TIPSS闭塞后肝功能和门体压力梯度的恢复
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(2):148-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0079-6. Epub 2002 Feb 19.
8
PTFE-covered stents improve TIPS patency in Budd-Chiari syndrome.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架可提高布加综合征经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的通畅率。
Hepatology. 2004 Nov;40(5):1197-202. doi: 10.1002/hep.20436.
9
[Clinical results and hemodynamic changes of portal venous system in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt].经颈静脉肝内门体分流术门静脉系统的临床结果及血流动力学变化
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1996 May;34(5):303-6.
10
[The impact of secondary insertion of ePTFE-coated stent on sustainable TIPS patency].[ePTFE涂层支架二次植入对经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)长期通畅性的影响]
Vnitr Lek. 2007 Feb;53(2):123-8.