Suppr超能文献

关节镜辅助下前交叉韧带重建:髌腱骨移植与腘绳肌腱自体移植的比较

Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autograft.

作者信息

Boonriong Tanarat, Kietsiriroje Niran

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87(9):1100-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and the hamstring tendons are commonly used for arthroscopially-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To compare the results of arthroscopically-assisted ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendons grafts in terms of postoperative knee stability, knee functions and clinical rating scale, and patient satisfaction.

HYPOTHESIS

There was no difference in the outcomes of the two grafts.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective non-randomized clinical trial.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Two groups of patients, 45 in the BPTB group and 30 in the hamstring group, were followed for at least one year.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar pre-operative data except the hamstring group which had a significantly shorter duration of injury before operation (9.5 versus 18 months, p < 0.05). There was no difference in median pre-operative Lysholm knee score (74 in the BPTB group versus 75 in the hamstring group, p > 0.05) and the post-operative one (95 in the BPTB group versus 99 in the hamstring group, p > 0.05). There was also no difference in the median pre-operative HSS knee score (58 in the BPTB group versus 61 in the hamstring group, p > 0.05). Although there was a statistically significant difference in the median post-operative HSS knee score between the two groups (95 in the BPTB group versus 96 in the hamstring group, p < 0.05), this was not clinically significant since both scores were rated as an excellent result. Both groups had a significantly improved knee stability and knee functions (Lysholm and HSS knee scores). The hamstring group, however, had significantly higher patient satisfaction (88% in the BPTB group versus 93% in the hamstring group, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the BPTB and the hamstring tendon grafts resulted in significantly improved knee stability and functions with high patient satisfaction. The hamstring tendon group, however, had a significantly better post-operative patient satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale, VAS).

摘要

背景

髌腱-骨(BPTB)和腘绳肌腱常用于关节镜辅助下的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建。

目的

比较关节镜辅助下使用髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱移植物进行ACL重建在术后膝关节稳定性、膝关节功能和临床评分量表以及患者满意度方面的结果。

假设

两种移植物的结果无差异。

研究设计

回顾性非随机临床试验。

材料与方法

两组患者,BPTB组45例,腘绳肌组30例,随访至少一年。

结果

两组术前数据相似,但腘绳肌组术前损伤持续时间明显较短(9.5个月对18个月,p<0.05)。术前Lysholm膝关节评分中位数无差异(BPTB组74分对腘绳肌组75分,p>0.05),术后也无差异(BPTB组95分对腘绳肌组99分,p>0.05)。术前HSS膝关节评分中位数也无差异(BPTB组58分对腘绳肌组61分,p>0.05)。虽然两组术后HSS膝关节评分中位数有统计学差异(BPTB组95分对腘绳肌组96分,p<0.05),但由于两个评分均被评为优秀结果,所以在临床上并不显著。两组膝关节稳定性和膝关节功能(Lysholm和HSS膝关节评分)均有显著改善。然而,腘绳肌组患者满意度明显更高(BPTB组88%对腘绳肌组93%,p<0.05)。

结论

髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱移植物均能显著改善膝关节稳定性和功能,患者满意度高。然而,腘绳肌腱组术后患者满意度明显更好(视觉模拟评分法,VAS)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验