Luby Stephen P, Agboatwalla Mubina, Hoekstra Robert M, Rahbar Mohammad H, Billhimer Ward, Keswick Bruce H
Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Centers for Infectious Diseases, Mailstop A-38, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Oct;71(4):420-7.
We introduced home drinking water disinfection and handwashing with soap in Karachi squatter settlements to evaluate their effect on diarrhea. In April 2000, 150 households received soap, 76 received dilute bleach and a water storage vessel, and 76 were enrolled as controls. In 2000, among households wealthy enough to own a refrigerator, children in households that received bleach and a vessel had a 73% lower incidence of diarrhea than controls; those that received soap had a 56% lower incidence. There was no reduction in diarrhea in intervention households without a refrigerator. In 2001, households that received bleach and a vessel had a 71% lower incidence of diarrhea and children in households that received soap had a 35% lower incidence than controls. In 2001, the interventions were equally effective in households that had a refrigerator and those that did not. Both of these home-based interventions were ultimately effective in preventing diarrhea, but only households of slightly higher socioeconomic status changed their behavior quickly enough to benefit during the first summer.
我们在卡拉奇的棚户区引入了家庭饮用水消毒和用肥皂洗手措施,以评估其对腹泻的影响。2000年4月,150户家庭收到了肥皂,76户收到了稀释的漂白剂和一个储水容器,76户被登记为对照组。2000年,在富裕到足以拥有冰箱的家庭中,收到漂白剂和容器的家庭中的儿童腹泻发病率比对照组低73%;收到肥皂的家庭中的儿童腹泻发病率低56%。没有冰箱的干预家庭中腹泻情况没有减少。2001年,收到漂白剂和容器的家庭腹泻发病率比对照组低71%,收到肥皂的家庭中的儿童腹泻发病率低35%。2001年,这些干预措施在有冰箱的家庭和没有冰箱的家庭中效果相同。这两种家庭干预措施最终都有效地预防了腹泻,但只有社会经济地位略高的家庭能够足够快地改变其行为,从而在第一个夏天就受益。