• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A "little five" lexically based perspective on personality disorder symptoms in adolescence.

作者信息

De Clercq Barbara, De Fruyt Filip, Van Leeuwen Karla

机构信息

Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2004 Oct;18(5):479-99. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.5.479.51324.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.18.5.479.51324
PMID:15519958
Abstract

Recently, De Clercq and De Fruyt (2003) examined the relation between adaptive and maladaptive personality functioning in adolescence, using adult measures to describe adolescent personality and personality pathology, i.e., that is the NEOPI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and the ADP-IV (Schotte & De Doncker, 1994) respectively. The present study extends this work, administering a lexically based and age-specific measure of adaptive personality, i.e., that is the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC; Mervielde & De Fruyt, 1999), to 454 nonclinical adolescents. Results largely replicated across adult FFM versus lexically derived and age-specific measures, although HiPIC domains explained a larger proportion of disorder variance, with Benevolence and Conscientiousness especially demonstrating less descriptive specificity. Lexically derived facets were further helpful to achieve greater disorder-descriptive specificity. Finally, adolescent personality pathology, when operationalized using Axis II criteria, showed more overlap in adolescence than in adults. It is concluded that future studies should focus on age-specific taxonomies and measures to assess personality pathology in adolescence.

摘要

相似文献

1
A "little five" lexically based perspective on personality disorder symptoms in adolescence.
J Pers Disord. 2004 Oct;18(5):479-99. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.5.479.51324.
2
A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.从五因素模型角度看法医精神病学样本中的精神病态与共病的轴II障碍
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
3
The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: domain facet and residualized facet descriptions.在一个异质性精神科样本中,克隆宁格心理生物学模型与五因素模型预测《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍的效度:领域层面和残差层面描述
J Pers. 2006 Apr;74(2):479-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x.
4
General and maladaptive personality dimensions and the assessment of callous-unemotional traits in adolescence.一般和适应不良的人格维度与青少年的冷酷无情特质评估。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Oct;25(5):681-701. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.681.
5
The structure of axis II disorders in adolescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria.青少年轴II障碍的结构:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版类别及标准的聚类分析和因素分析研究
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):440-61. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.440.
6
Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample.非临床样本中的维度人格特质与DSM-IV人格障碍症状计数的预测
J Pers Disord. 2005 Feb;19(1):53-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.19.1.53.62180.
7
Childhood antecedents of personality disorder: an alternative perspective.人格障碍的童年先兆:一种不同的视角。
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Summer;21(3):771-91. doi: 10.1017/S095457940900042X.
8
The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence.青少年期人格解体-精神分裂症量表(PID-5)特质测量的层次结构和结构效度
J Pers. 2014 Apr;82(2):158-69. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
9
Sadistic personality disorder and comorbid mental illness in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.青少年精神科住院患者中的施虐型人格障碍及共病性精神疾病
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(1):61-71.
10
Dimensions of personality pathology in adolescents: relations to DSM-IV personality disorder symptoms.青少年人格病理学的维度:与 DSM-IV 人格障碍症状的关系。
J Pers Disord. 2009 Oct;23(5):514-27. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.5.514.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of personality disorders in adolescents - a clinical validity and utility study of the structured interview of personality organization (STIPO).青少年人格障碍评估——人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO)的临床效度与实用性研究
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 May 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00901-9.
2
Correlates between Five-Factor Model traits and the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines dimensions in an adolescent clinical sample.青少年临床样本中五因素模型特质与修订版边缘型诊断访谈维度之间的相关性。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Nov;13(4):197-204. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1459. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Trajectories of social anxiety during adolescence and relations with cognition, social competence, and temperament.
青少年期社交焦虑的轨迹及其与认知、社会能力和气质的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;41(1):97-110. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9651-6.