McCall W V, Erwin C W, Edinger J D, Krystal A D, Marsh G R
Department of Psychiatry, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):68-77.
Ambulatory polysomnographic (APSG) assessment of sleep disorders is now possible, but the technique of APSG is sufficiently different from in-laboratory PSG that normative data from in-laboratory PSG may not apply to APSG. This paper reviews the technical aspects of APSG and presents normative APSG data from 20 older healthy males. Subjects underwent medical and psychiatric screening before completing APSG in their homes. Total sleep time and the rapid-eye-movement sleep latency (RL) were both shorter than those reported by others using traditional in-laboratory techniques. The shorter total sleep may be related to behaviors at home that impinge upon sleep. The shorter RL may be related to differences in calculation methods. Periodic limb movements were common in our subjects but did not contribute to sleep disturbance. We conclude that APSG is sufficiently different from traditional PSG as to warrant collection of a large normative data base.
现在可以通过动态多导睡眠图(APSG)对睡眠障碍进行评估,但APSG技术与实验室多导睡眠图(PSG)有很大不同,以至于实验室PSG的标准数据可能不适用于APSG。本文回顾了APSG的技术方面,并展示了来自20名健康老年男性的APSG标准数据。受试者在居家完成APSG之前接受了医学和精神科筛查。总睡眠时间和快速眼动睡眠潜伏期(RL)均短于其他使用传统实验室技术报告的结果。总睡眠时间较短可能与在家中影响睡眠的行为有关。RL较短可能与计算方法的差异有关。周期性肢体运动在我们的受试者中很常见,但并未导致睡眠障碍。我们得出结论,APSG与传统PSG有足够大的差异,因此有必要收集大量的标准数据库。