• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq, and Afghanistan? An invitation for military physicians to speak out.

作者信息

Lundberg George D

出版信息

MedGenMed. 2004 Aug 20;6(3):39.

PMID:15520663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1435624/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq, and Afghanistan? An invitation for military physicians to speak out.在关塔那摩、伊拉克和阿富汗，医生是否参与了政府支持的人体酷刑？邀请军事医生发声。
MedGenMed. 2004 Aug 20;6(3):39.
2
Editor's note regarding "Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan? An inviation for military physicians to speak out".
MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 8;6(4):29.
3
Readers' responses to the webcast video editorial entitled regarding "Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan? An inviation for military physicians to speak out".读者对题为《关塔那摩、伊拉克和阿富汗存在医生参与国家支持的人体酷刑行为吗？邀请军方医生发声》的网络直播视频社论的回应。
MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 8;6(4):30; author reply 29.
4
Red Cross find detainee abuse in Guantanamo; US rejects accusations; confidential report calls practice tantamount to torture.红十字会发现关塔那摩存在虐囚现象；美国否认指控；机密报告称这种行为等同于酷刑。
N Y Times Web. 2004 Nov 30:A1, A14.
5
Hunger strikers: ethical and legal dimensions of medical complicity in torture at Guantanamo Bay.绝食者：关塔那摩湾酷刑中医疗共谋的伦理和法律维度。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Dec;28(6):616-24. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008868. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Medical complicity in torture at Guantánamo Bay: evidence is the first step toward justice.关塔那摩湾酷刑中的医疗共谋：证据是迈向正义的第一步。
PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1001028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001028. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
7
Dilemmas in military medical ethics since 9/11.9·11事件后的军事医学伦理困境
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003 Jun;13(2):175-88. doi: 10.1353/ken.2003.0010.
8
Abu Ghraib:its legacy for military medicine.阿布格莱布监狱：其对军事医学的影响。
Lancet. 2004;364(9435):725-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16902-X.
9
Doctors and torture.医生与酷刑。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048065.
10
How complicit are doctors in abuses of detainees?医生在虐待被拘留者的行为中充当了多大程度的同谋？
Lancet. 2004;364(9435):637-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16904-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare professionals and dual loyalty: technical proficiency is not enough.医疗保健专业人员与双重忠诚：技术熟练是不够的。
MedGenMed. 2005 Aug 4;7(3):14.
2
Readers' responses to the webcast video editorial entitled regarding "Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan? An inviation for military physicians to speak out".读者对题为《关塔那摩、伊拉克和阿富汗存在医生参与国家支持的人体酷刑行为吗？邀请军方医生发声》的网络直播视频社论的回应。
MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 8;6(4):30; author reply 29.
3
Editor's note regarding "Was there physician complicity in state-sponsored human torture in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan? An inviation for military physicians to speak out".
MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 8;6(4):29.

本文引用的文献

1
It's Over, Debbie.
JAMA. 1988 Jan 8;259(2):272. doi: 10.1001/jama.259.2.272.
2
Doctors and torture.医生与酷刑。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048065.