Suppr超能文献

Why are there differences in the perceived safety of office-based surgery?

作者信息

Hancox John G, Venkat Arun P, Hill Alicia, Graham Gloria F, Williford Phillip M, Coldiron Brett, Feldman Steven R, Balkrishnan Rajesh

机构信息

Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):1377-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30432.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Office-based surgery has become an important method of health-care delivery, but there is controversy about its safety and which practitioners should perform it. Several states have already or are preparing to enact legislation regulating office-based surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to discuss recent literature pertaining to the safety of office surgery and to discuss reasons why there are perceived differences in its safety.

METHODS

The pertinent literature is reviewed. Results. The majority of studies suggest that office surgery is safe. A recent study that found to the contrary may have methodologic flaws.

CONCLUSION

The medical and legislative community should seek to scientifically examine office surgery. Overregulation or loss of office surgery would have a tremendous impact on the management of skin cancers and the delivery of quality cosmetic and laser surgery.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验