Chlup Rudolf, Bartek Josef, Reznícková Martina, Zapletalová Jana, Doubravová Blanka, Chlupová Ludmila, Seckar Pavel, Dvorácková Svatava, Simánek Vilím
Institute of Physiology and IInd Deptartment of Medicine, Palacký University & Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2004 Jul;148(1):17-25. doi: 10.5507/bp.2004.003.
The glycaemic index (GI) is a measure of the food power to raise blood glucose (B-glucose) concentration after a meal. For healthy eating, foods with low GI are recommended. However, for many foods in the European Union the GI has not been defined yet. The aims of this prospective open-label study were: (1) to determine the GI of white bread and juicy cereal bars FIT (Usovsko, Czech Republic) by means of the glucometer Optium (Abbott/Medisense); (2) to compare the GI of tested foods determined in the morning and in the evening hours; (3) to compare the GI of tested foods in men and women and (4) to assess the variability of the GI.
To determine the GI, measured portions of food containing 50 g of carbohydrates were eaten by 11 healthy volunteers. B-glucose curves were constructed from B-glucose values at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 60, 120 min after the meal. The GI was calculated by dividing the incremental area under the curve (IAUC) for the tested food by that for the standard food (IAUCS). In each volunteer each food was tested 5 times so that 5 GI's was obtained and the average was calculated. The GI for each tested food was calculated as the mean from the respective average GI's of the 11 volunteers. MS Excel and the statistical program SPSS v. 10.1 were used to analyze the data.
(1) The mean values of the GI for white bread was 70.3 % and for juicy cereal bars was 101.0 %, as determined in a total of 139 tests in the whole group of 11 volunteers. There was a difference when comparing white bread vs. glucose (p = 0.012) and white bread vs. cereal bars (p = 0.026) but no difference between glucose and cereal bars. (2) There was no significant difference between the GI determined in the morning and in the evening hours either for the total of 139 tests or for the individual tested foods. (3) No significant difference could be seen between the GI in men and women when comparing glucose, cereal bars and white bread. (4) There was a wide variability of GI in all tested foods: the standard deviation of GI for white bread was 30.7 %, for juicy cereal bars 38.0 %.
The GI's for white bread and juicy cereal bars were determined. There was no difference either between the GI values determined in the morning vs. the evening hours or between the values in men vs. women. The results show wide variability. An accurate standard method for the determination of GI needs to be defined, carefully used and re-evaluated to enable a comparison of the results with various methods of other working groups.
血糖生成指数(GI)是衡量食物在进食后升高血糖(β - 葡萄糖)浓度能力的指标。为了健康饮食,建议选择低GI值的食物。然而,在欧盟,许多食物的GI值尚未确定。这项前瞻性开放标签研究的目的是:(1)通过Optium血糖仪(雅培/美迪信)测定白面包和多汁谷物棒FIT(捷克共和国乌索夫斯科)的GI值;(2)比较在早晨和晚上测定的受试食物的GI值;(3)比较男性和女性受试食物的GI值;(4)评估GI值的变异性。
为了测定GI值,11名健康志愿者食用了含有50克碳水化合物的定量食物。根据进食后0、15、30、45、60、120分钟时的β - 葡萄糖值绘制β - 葡萄糖曲线。GI值通过将受试食物的曲线下增量面积(IAUC)除以标准食物的曲线下增量面积(IAUCS)来计算。在每位志愿者中,每种食物测试5次,从而获得5个GI值并计算平均值。每种受试食物的GI值通过11名志愿者各自平均GI值的均值来计算。使用MS Excel和统计软件SPSS v. 10.1对数据进行分析。
(1)在11名志愿者的整个组中总共进行的139次测试中,白面包的GI平均值为70.3%,多汁谷物棒的GI平均值为101.0%。比较白面包与葡萄糖(p = 0.012)以及白面包与谷物棒(p = 0.026)时存在差异,但葡萄糖与谷物棒之间无差异。(2)在总共139次测试中,无论是早晨还是晚上测定的GI值,对于单个受试食物而言均无显著差异。(3)比较葡萄糖、谷物棒和白面包时,男性和女性的GI值之间未见显著差异。(4)所有受试食物的GI值存在很大变异性:白面包GI值的标准差为30.7%,多汁谷物棒为38.0%。
测定了白面包和多汁谷物棒的GI值。早晨与晚上测定的GI值之间以及男性与女性的GI值之间均无差异。结果显示变异性很大。需要定义一种准确的标准方法来测定GI值,并谨慎使用和重新评估,以便能够将结果与其他工作组的各种方法进行比较。