Wylie Judith, McGuinness Carol
School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Dec;74(Pt 4):497-514. doi: 10.1348/0007099042376418.
Interest in the interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on learning from text is increasing but experimental manipulations of knowledge and structure variables often produce findings that do not help teachers to select expository texts for students.
We aimed to extend the ecological validity of previous findings by asking students with a high or low level of discipline-relevant knowledge to read texts characteristic of those they would normally encounter. A compensation effect was hypothesized, where high prior knowledge would compensate for a lack of text structure and text structure would compensate for a lack of prior knowledge.
One hundred and ninety-five undergraduate psychology students (144 Year 1 students and 51 Year 3 students) were allocated to a high knowledge (HiPK) or low knowledge (LoPK) group on the basis of their performance on a word association test.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of five text structure groups (compare/contrast, sequence, classification, enumeration, generalization) and asked to study two cognitive psychology passages before recalling the main points of the text immediately afterwards and after a delay of 2 weeks. The five text structures were placed on an 'organizational continuum' according to the degree of structure/organization in the 10 passages.
A compensation effect did not emerge. Recall was high when texts were well structured and readers had prior knowledge, but recall was poor when texts were less structured, regardless of the level of prior knowledge.
Readers benefit most from texts that challenge pre-existing mental representations.
对于先前知识和文本结构在从文本学习中的交互作用的兴趣日益增加,但对知识和结构变量的实验操纵往往产生的结果无助于教师为学生选择说明文文本。
我们旨在通过让具有高或低学科相关知识水平的学生阅读他们通常会遇到的文本类型,来扩展先前研究结果的生态效度。我们假设存在一种补偿效应,即高先前知识会弥补文本结构的不足,而文本结构会弥补先前知识的不足。
195名本科心理学专业学生(144名一年级学生和51名三年级学生)根据他们在词语联想测试中的表现被分配到高知识(HiPK)或低知识(LoPK)组。
参与者被随机分配到五个文本结构组之一(比较/对比、顺序、分类、列举、概括),并要求他们学习两篇认知心理学文章,然后立即回忆文章要点,并在2周后再次回忆。根据10篇文章的结构/组织程度,将这五种文本结构置于一个“组织连续体”上。
未出现补偿效应。当文本结构良好且读者有先前知识时,回忆效果较好,但当文本结构较差时,无论先前知识水平如何,回忆效果都较差。
读者从挑战既有心理表征的文本中受益最大。