• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过多个摘要提高文本召回率。

Improving text recall with multiple summaries.

机构信息

Department of Instructional Technology, Faculty of Behavioral Science, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):257-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x
PMID:22583090
Abstract

BACKGROUND

QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within-document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full.

AIM

To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants' perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental - control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text.

SAMPLE

Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits.

METHOD

Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information.

RESULTS

Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text.

CONCLUSION

Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics.

摘要

背景

QuikScan(QS)是一种创新设计,旨在通过频繁的文档内摘要(格式为编号列表项)提高说明文的可访问性、可理解性和后续回忆能力。QS 摘要中的数字对应于文档正文中的数字,摘要中讨论的想法在这些数字处有详细的讨论。

目的

通过实验-对照组设计,比较 QS 文本和结构摘要(SA)文本的效果,考察 QS 摘要对参与者对文本质量(即可理解性、结构和趣味性)和回忆的影响。

样本

40 名心理学学生自愿参加或获得课程学分。

方法

学生首先阅读闪光灯记忆(FBM)的对照(SA)或实验(QS)文本。接下来,通过问卷测量他们对文本质量的感知。回忆通过带有事实、理解和高阶信息项目的开放式答案测试进行评估。

结果

文本质量的感知在条件之间没有差异。但是,QS 确实导致了显著且实质性的(d=1.57)整体回忆得分提高。与阅读 SA 文本的参与者相比,阅读 QS 文本的参与者在所有项目类型上的表现都显著更好。

结论

与 SA 文本相比,阅读 QS 文本可显著提高回忆能力。需要进一步研究读者如何研究 QS 文本,以及文本模型假设或重复效应假设是否可以解释其有效性。第一个假设认为,QS 摘要支持读者构建文本图式。第二个假设将这些摘要的效果归因于它们对文本主题的重复。

相似文献

1
Improving text recall with multiple summaries.通过多个摘要提高文本召回率。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):257-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
2
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
3
The interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on memory for cognitive psychology texts.先验知识与文本结构对认知心理学文本记忆的交互作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Dec;74(Pt 4):497-514. doi: 10.1348/0007099042376418.
4
Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.先前不恰当的突出显示对阅读理解和元认知准确性的有害影响。
J Gen Psychol. 2009 Jul;136(3):287-300. doi: 10.3200/GENP.136.3.287-302.
5
Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.通过识别评估文本表征:领域知识与文本连贯性的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):816-27. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.816.
6
Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort.文本类型、主题熟悉度和口吃频率对听众回忆、理解及心理努力的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):534-46. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0238). Epub 2008 Dec 8.
7
Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.文本略读:在时间压力下通过文本觅食的过程和效果。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):228-42. doi: 10.1037/a0016995.
8
Effects of advance questions on reading comprehension.提前提问对阅读理解的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1996 Oct;123(4):352-64. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1996.9921287.
9
Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension.文本理解中激活背景信息的消解。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Aug 1;45(4):241-9. doi: 10.1080/00207590903085521.
10
Influence of text cohesion on the persuasive power of expository text.篇章衔接对说明文说服力的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Jun;52(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00863.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.