• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在科学教育中使用文本:认知过程与知识表示。

Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.

机构信息

Department of Education and Child Studies, University of Leiden, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Science. 2010 Apr 23;328(5977):453-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1182594.

DOI:10.1126/science.1182594
PMID:20413489
Abstract

Texts form a powerful tool in teaching concepts and principles in science. How do readers extract information from a text, and what are the limitations in this process? Central to comprehension of and learning from a text is the construction of a coherent mental representation that integrates the textual information and relevant background knowledge. This representation engenders learning if it expands the reader's existing knowledge base or if it corrects misconceptions in this knowledge base. The Landscape Model captures the reading process and the influences of reader characteristics (such as working-memory capacity, reading goal, prior knowledge, and inferential skills) and text characteristics (such as content/structure of presented information, processing demands, and textual cues). The model suggests factors that can optimize--or jeopardize--learning science from text.

摘要

文本是教授科学概念和原理的有力工具。读者如何从文本中提取信息,以及这个过程有哪些限制?理解和从文本中学习的核心是构建一个连贯的心理表征,将文本信息和相关背景知识整合在一起。如果这个表示能够扩展读者现有的知识库,或者纠正知识库中的误解,那么它就会产生学习效果。景观模型(Landscape Model)捕捉了阅读过程以及读者特征(如工作记忆容量、阅读目标、先验知识和推理技能)和文本特征(如呈现信息的内容/结构、处理需求和文本线索)的影响。该模型提出了一些可以优化(或破坏)从文本中学习科学的因素。

相似文献

1
Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.在科学教育中使用文本:认知过程与知识表示。
Science. 2010 Apr 23;328(5977):453-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1182594.
2
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
3
[Influence of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during picture and text comprehension].[可视化类型对图片与文本理解过程中心智模型构建的影响]
Z Exp Psychol. 1999;46(3):217-36.
4
[Text comprehension, cognitive resources and aging].[文本理解、认知资源与衰老]
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2007 Mar;5(1):47-64.
5
The interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on memory for cognitive psychology texts.先验知识与文本结构对认知心理学文本记忆的交互作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Dec;74(Pt 4):497-514. doi: 10.1348/0007099042376418.
6
The neural correlates of strategic reading comprehension: cognitive control and discourse comprehension.战略阅读理解的神经关联:认知控制和语篇理解。
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):675-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text.从叙述性和说明性文本中学习和记忆事实性内容。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Sep;77(Pt 3):541-64. doi: 10.1348/000709906X143902.
8
Increasing readers' comprehension of health education brochures: a qualitative study into how professional writers make texts coherent.提高读者对健康教育手册的理解:一项关于专业作者如何使文本连贯的定性研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Dec;31(6):720-40. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263340.
9
The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers.工作记忆和流畅性练习对阅读障碍学生阅读理解的作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):548-75. doi: 10.1177/0022219409338742. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
10
The role of prior knowledge and elaboration in text comprehension and memory: a comparison of self-generated elaboration and text-provided elaboration.先验知识与细化在文本理解和记忆中的作用:自我生成的细化与文本提供的细化之比较
Am J Psychol. 1998 Fall;111(3):353-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the rereading effect of digital reading through eye movements using artificial neural networks.利用人工神经网络通过眼动评估数字阅读的重读效果。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1576247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1576247. eCollection 2025.
2
An ICEEMDAN and SAX-based method for determining English reading comprehension status using functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals.一种基于ICEEMDAN和SAX利用功能近红外光谱信号确定英语阅读理解状态的方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0326359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326359. eCollection 2025.
3
Gender-based violence in Latin America (Ecuador and Argentina): current state and challenges in the development of psychoeducational materials.
拉丁美洲(厄瓜多尔和阿根廷)基于性别的暴力:心理教育材料开发的现状与挑战
Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00060-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
The neural and cognitive basis of expository text comprehension.说明文阅读理解的神经和认知基础。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Mar 21;9(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00232-y.
5
Relationships between task awareness, comprehension strategies, and literacy outcomes.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 3;14:1056457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056457. eCollection 2023.
6
PROPERTIES OF A COMBINED MEASURE OF READING AND WRITING: THE ASSESSMENT OF WRITING, SELF-MONITORING, AND READING (AWSM READER).读写综合测量的属性:写作、自我监控和阅读评估(AWSM阅读者)
Read Writ. 2023 Mar;36(3):723-744. doi: 10.1007/s11145-022-10274-6. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
7
The influence of books' textual features and caregivers' extratextual talk on children's science learning in the context of shared book reading.在共享阅读的背景下,书籍的文本特征和照顾者的额外话语对儿童科学学习的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2023 Feb;59(2):390-411. doi: 10.1037/dev0001480. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Storytelling as a Tool to Enhance Conceptual Knowledge in Cell Biology.讲故事作为增强细胞生物学概念性知识的工具。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Jul 12;23(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00308-21. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.从眼球运动到扫描路径网络:一种研究说明文阅读中个体差异的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):730-750. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01842-3. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
10
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements.对与问题相关的文本信息的选择性关注先于高质量的总结:来自眼动的证据。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 May 30;12(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.6.