• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does measurement dependence explain the effects of the Life Skills Training program on smoking outcomes?

作者信息

Gorman Dennis M

机构信息

School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Bryan, TX 77802, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2005 Apr;40(4):479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.005
PMID:15530601
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Life Skills Training (LST) program is the most prominent school-based smoking prevention program in terms of its consistency in being named on lists of best practices. This study assessed whether the results pertaining to cigarette smoking reported in evaluations of the LST program are measurement dependent.

METHODS

Seventeen reports published between 1980 and 2003 that included at least one outcome measure pertaining to cigarette smoking were identified. Data pertaining to the cigarette smoking measures used in the analysis and whether the results showed a statistically significant difference between experimental and control groups at follow-up were extracted from the reports.

RESULTS

Fourteen different outcome measures were used across 17 reports. Only three pairs of reports presented the same set of outcomes. Recent reports showed the most consistent set of findings in support of the LST program, but there was little consistency in the outcome measures used in these analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of so many smoking outcomes in the LST program evaluations raises concern as to whether the positive program effects reported are measurement dependent.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does measurement dependence explain the effects of the Life Skills Training program on smoking outcomes?
Prev Med. 2005 Apr;40(4):479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.005.
2
Avoiding "truth": tobacco industry promotion of life skills training.回避“真相”:烟草行业对生活技能培训的推广
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Dec;39(6):868-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
3
Evaluation of a self-directed smoking prevention and cessation program.一项自我导向的吸烟预防与戒烟项目评估。
Pediatr Nurs. 2000 Mar-Apr;26(2):150-3.
4
The television, school, and family smoking prevention and cessation project. VIII. Student outcomes and mediating variables.
Prev Med. 1995 Jan;24(1):29-40. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1005.
5
Impact of A Smoking Prevention Interactive Experience (ASPIRE), an interactive, multimedia smoking prevention and cessation curriculum for culturally diverse high-school students.“吸烟预防互动体验”(ASPIRE)的影响,这是一个针对文化背景多样的高中生的互动式多媒体吸烟预防与戒烟课程。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Sep;10(9):1477-85. doi: 10.1080/14622200802323183.
6
The effects of a three-year smoking prevention programme in secondary schools in Helsinki.赫尔辛基中学一项为期三年的吸烟预防计划的效果。
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Jun;17(3):249-56. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl107. Epub 2007 Jan 5.
7
Fifteen-month follow-up results of a school-based life-skills approach to smoking prevention.一项基于学校的生活技能吸烟预防方法的15个月随访结果。
Health Educ Res. 2004 Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg018.
8
Preventing tobacco and drug use among Thai high school students through life skills training.通过生活技能培训预防泰国高中生吸烟和吸毒。
Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Sep;8(3):164-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00275.x.
9
Computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention in a general population setting in Germany: outcome of a randomized controlled trial.德国普通人群中计算机定制戒烟干预措施:一项随机对照试验的结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Feb;10(2):371-9. doi: 10.1080/14622200701825767.
10
Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging.你在收到短信后会吸烟吗?一项使用手机短信进行戒烟的随机试验结果。
Tob Control. 2005 Aug;14(4):255-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011577.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a registered trial be reported as a one-group, pretest-posttest study with no explanation? A critique of Williams et al. (2021).一项已注册的试验能否在没有任何解释的情况下被报告为单组前后测研究?对威廉姆斯等人(2021年)的评论。
Health Justice. 2022 Jan 3;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00165-3.
2
Is Project Towards No Drug Abuse (Project TND) an evidence-based drug and violence prevention program? A review and reappraisal of the evaluation studies.“无药物滥用计划”(TND计划)是一个基于证据的预防毒品和暴力项目吗?对评估研究的回顾与重新评估。
J Prim Prev. 2014 Aug;35(4):217-32. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0348-1.