Staniszewska Sophie, Henderson Lorna
RCN Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.002.
Patient experiences surveys have become common within healthcare and represent an important form of participation, with patients having the potential ability to influence the quality of care. However, there is still a relatively limited understanding of how patients evaluate the quality of their care. We present the findings of a qualitative study, which explored the way in which patients express their evaluations, in an attempt to move the debate forward. The results indicate that patient evaluation appears to be far more complex than routinely acknowledged, particularly in relation to the expression of negative experiences. Patients were reluctant to offer directly negative criticisms, needed particular conditions in which to express their negative evaluations and used a variety of adaptive strategies to overcome social pressures that inhibited negative evaluation and promoted positive evaluation. We argue that standardised approaches to measuring negative evaluations, such as questionnaires, need to become more sensitive to the complexities of negative evaluation. This would enhance the extent to which patients can participate in influencing the quality of care. A number of recommendations are made to develop the sensitivity of future investigations into the negative aspects of patient experiences.
患者体验调查在医疗保健领域已变得很普遍,是一种重要的参与形式,患者有可能影响护理质量。然而,对于患者如何评估其护理质量的理解仍然相对有限。我们展示了一项定性研究的结果,该研究探讨了患者表达其评估的方式,以期推动相关辩论的进展。结果表明,患者评估似乎比通常认为的要复杂得多,尤其是在负面体验的表达方面。患者不愿直接提出负面批评,需要特定条件来表达其负面评估,并采用各种适应性策略来克服抑制负面评估并促进正面评估的社会压力。我们认为,诸如问卷调查等衡量负面评估的标准化方法需要对负面评估的复杂性更加敏感。这将提高患者能够参与影响护理质量的程度。我们提出了一些建议,以提高未来对患者体验负面方面调查的敏感性。