Aittasalo Minna, Miilunpalo Seppo, Suni Jaana
The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1 FIN-33500, Tampere, Finland.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.003.
Voluntary employees (N = 155) from nine different companies were screened by questionnaire for the study. They were randomized into three study groups: counseling (n = 52), counseling + fitness testing (n = 51) and control group (n = 52). The counseling was based on a goal-oriented conversation session for each participant and three follow-up appointments with an occupational nurse over a period of 1 year. The fitness tests were adapted from the UKK Health-related Fitness Test Battery. The outcome measures were the changes in the amount of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) assessed by diary, pedometer and questionnaire at baseline and at 6 and 12 month follow-up visits. As a result, no statistically significant differences were detected between the three groups at either of the follow-up visits. It seemed, thus, that the two PA counseling methods implemented had no direct mid- or long-term effects on the LTPA of voluntary employees with no specific disease-related indication to increase LTPA.
本研究通过问卷调查对来自9家不同公司的155名自愿参与的员工进行了筛查。他们被随机分为三个研究组：咨询组（n = 52）、咨询+体能测试组（n = 51）和对照组（n = 52）。咨询基于为每位参与者进行的目标导向对话环节，以及在1年时间内与职业护士进行的三次随访预约。体能测试采用了芬兰运动健康测试量表（UKK）的相关测试项目。研究的主要观察指标是通过日记、计步器和问卷调查评估的基线、6个月和12个月随访时休闲时间身体活动（LTPA）量的变化。结果显示，在两次随访中，三组之间均未检测到统计学上的显著差异。因此，对于没有特定疾病相关指征来增加LTPA的自愿员工而言，所实施的两种身体活动咨询方法似乎对其LTPA没有直接的中期或长期影响。
