Mugellini Amedeo, Dobovisek Jurij, Planinc Danijel, Cremonesi Giovanni, Fogari Roberto
Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Clinica Medica II, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.018.
The use of combination therapy is required to achieve blood pressure targets in 40% to 75% of patients with hypertension. There have been few studies comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the new fixed combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor delapril 30 mg and the calcium channel antagonist manidipine 10 mg with those of a standard combination of another ACE inhibitor and a diuretic.
The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of delapril 30 mg given alone or with manidipine 10 mg with those of enalapril 20 mg given alone or with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
This was a multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. After an initial 2-week placebo run-in period, patients aged 18 to 75 years with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =90 and < or =109 mm Hg were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive delapril or enalapril for 8 weeks. After the initial 8 weeks, nonresponders (DBP > or =85 mm Hg) received an additional 8 weeks of treatment with a fixed combination of delapril + manidipine or enalapril + HCTZ; patients whose DBP was normalized continued their initial monotherapy through the end of the study. The primary efficacy variable was the change in sitting DBP at the end of treatment. Secondary efficacy variables were the percentage of patients whose DBP was normalized (DBP Z:85 mm Hg) and the percentage of responders (> or =10-mm Hg reduction in DBP or DBP <85 mm Hg).
One hundred sixty patients (84 men, 76 women) were randomized to receive delapril (n = 106) or enalapril (n = 54). After 16 weeks of treatment, the mean (SD) reduction in DBP was similar with the 2 treatments (delapril, -14 [8] mm Hg; enalapril, -15 [8] mm Hg). In the delapril and enalapril groups, DBP was normalized in a respective 55 (51.9%) and 29 (53.7%) patients, and 77 (72.6%) and 38 (70.4%) were responders; there was no significant difference between groups. Tolerability was also similar in both groups--10 (9.4%) patients in the delapril group and 5 (9.3%) in the enalapril group experienced adverse events that were judged related to treatment.
The results of this study suggest that delapril alone or combined with manidipine is well tolerated and as effective as enalapril alone or combined with HCTZ in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
40%至75%的高血压患者需要联合治疗以实现血压目标。很少有研究比较血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂地拉普利30毫克与钙通道拮抗剂马尼地平10毫克的新型固定复方制剂与另一种ACE抑制剂和利尿剂的标准复方制剂的疗效和耐受性。
本研究旨在比较单独使用30毫克地拉普利或与10毫克马尼地平联合使用,与单独使用20毫克依那普利或与12.5毫克氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)联合使用,在轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中的降压疗效和耐受性。
这是一项多中心、活性对照、平行组试验。在最初为期2周的安慰剂导入期后,年龄在18至75岁、舒张压(DBP)≥90且≤109毫米汞柱的患者按2:1的比例随机分组,接受地拉普利或依那普利治疗8周。在最初的8周后,无反应者(DBP≥85毫米汞柱)接受额外8周的地拉普利+马尼地平或依那普利+HCTZ固定复方制剂治疗;DBP恢复正常的患者在研究结束前继续接受最初的单一疗法。主要疗效变量是治疗结束时坐位DBP的变化。次要疗效变量是DBP恢复正常(DBP<85毫米汞柱)的患者百分比和反应者百分比(DBP降低≥10毫米汞柱或DBP<85毫米汞柱)。
160例患者(84例男性,76例女性)被随机分组接受地拉普利(n = 106)或依那普利(n = 54)治疗。治疗16周后,两种治疗方法使DBP的平均(标准差)降低相似(地拉普利,-14[8]毫米汞柱;依那普利,-15[8]毫米汞柱)。在地拉普利组和依那普利组中,分别有55例(51.9%)和29例(53.7%)患者的DBP恢复正常,77例(72.6%)和38例(70.4%)为反应者;两组之间无显著差异。两组的耐受性也相似——地拉普利组有10例(9.4%)患者和依那普利组有5例(9.3%)患者经历了被判定与治疗相关的不良事件。
本研究结果表明,单独使用地拉普利或与马尼地平联合使用耐受性良好,在降低轻度至中度原发性高血压患者血压方面与单独使用依那普利或与HCTZ联合使用效果相同。