Fogari Roberto, Derosa Giuseppe, Zoppi Annalisa, Rinaldi Andrea, Preti Paola, Lazzari Pierangelo, Mugellini Amedeo
Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Clinica Medica II-Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Italy.
Hypertens Res. 2008 Jan;31(1):43-50. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.43.
The purpose of this study was to compare the combination treatments of manidipine/delapril and olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in elderly diabetic hypertensives. After a 4-week placebo period, 158 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (age range: 66 to 74 years) were randomized to receive combination treatment of 10 mg manidipine plus 30 mg delapril or 20 mg olmesartan plus 12.5 mg HCTZ for 48 weeks in a prospective, parallel arm trial. After 12 weeks, manidipine or HCTZ was doubled in nonresponders (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > or =130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or =80 mmHg). Patients were checked at the end of the placebo period and every 12 weeks thereafter. At each visit, lying, sitting and standing BP as well as fasting glycemia, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), electrolytes, uric acid, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) were evaluated. Both combinations reduced sitting SBP (-27.7 and -28.3 mmHg, respectively; both p<0.001) and DBP (-15.1 and -14.8 mmHg, respectively; both p<0.01) with no difference between the two treatments. Standing DBP was more markedly reduced by olmesartan/HCTZ (-19.5 mmHg; p<0.001) than by manidipine/delapril (-14.7 mmHg; p<0.05 vs. olmesartan/HCTZ). No changes in metabolic parameters were observed with manidipine/delapril, whereas an increase in HbA1c (+0.7%; p<0.05), uric acid (+0.4 mg/dL; p<0.05) and TG (+41.3 mg/dL; p<0.05), and a decrease in serum potassium (-0.3 mmol/L; p<0.05) and HDL-C (-3.4 mg/dL; p<0.05) were found in the olmesartan/HCTZ group. In conclusion, both combinations were similarly effective in reducing BP in elderly hypertensive diabetic patients. However, manidipine/delapril offered some advantages in terms of the less-pronounced BP orthostatic changes and absence of metabolic adverse effects.
本研究旨在比较马尼地平/地拉普利与奥美沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)联合治疗老年糖尿病高血压患者的效果。经过4周的安慰剂期后,158例2型糖尿病高血压患者(年龄范围:66至74岁)被随机分配,在前瞻性平行组试验中接受10 mg马尼地平加30 mg地拉普利或20 mg奥美沙坦加12.5 mg HCTZ的联合治疗,为期48周。12周后,对无反应者(收缩压[SBP]≥130 mmHg和/或舒张压[DBP]≥80 mmHg)加倍使用马尼地平或HCTZ。在安慰剂期结束时以及此后每12周对患者进行检查。每次就诊时,评估卧位、坐位和立位血压以及空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、电解质、尿酸、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯(TG)。两种联合治疗均降低了坐位SBP(分别为-27.7和-28.3 mmHg;均p<0.001)和DBP(分别为-15.1和-14.8 mmHg;均p<0.01),两种治疗之间无差异。与马尼地平/地拉普利(-14.7 mmHg;与奥美沙坦/HCTZ相比,p<0.05)相比,奥美沙坦/HCTZ使立位DBP降低更显著(-19.5 mmHg;p<0.001)。马尼地平/地拉普利治疗后代谢参数无变化,而奥美沙坦/HCTZ组的HbA1c升高(+0.7%;p<0.05)、尿酸升高(+0.4 mg/dL;p<0.05)、TG升高(+41.3 mg/dL;p<0.05),血清钾降低(-0.3 mmol/L;p<0.05),HDL-C降低(-3.4 mg/dL;p<0.05)。总之,两种联合治疗在降低老年高血压糖尿病患者血压方面同样有效。然而,马尼地平/地拉普利在血压体位性变化不明显和无代谢不良反应方面具有一些优势。