Widdershoven G A M
Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Med Law. 2004;23(3):687-91.
Since 1999 reported cases of euthanasia in The Netherlands are examined in five regional review committees. In these committees a lawyer, an ethicist and a medical doctor investigate whether the cases reported are in correspondence with the so-called criteria for careful practice. Issues to be investigated include the patient's suffering, the nature of the patient's request, the consultation by another doctor and the way in which the termination of life has been performed. Since April 2002 the judgment of the committees is final. This paper describes the working of the review committees. It also discusses the relevance of experiences in the committee for issues of social and public debate, such as the role of the consulting doctor, the relation between euthanasia and palliative care, and the place of patient autonomy.
自1999年以来,荷兰报告的安乐死案例由五个地区审查委员会进行审查。在这些委员会中,一名律师、一名伦理学家和一名医生调查所报告的案例是否符合所谓的审慎实施标准。需要调查的问题包括患者的痛苦、患者请求的性质、另一名医生的会诊以及生命终结的实施方式。自2002年4月起,委员会的裁决即为最终裁决。本文描述了审查委员会的工作情况。它还讨论了委员会的经验对于社会和公众辩论问题的相关性,如会诊医生的作用、安乐死与姑息治疗的关系以及患者自主权的地位。